{
  "fields": [{"id":"_id","type":"int"},{"id":"ﾃﾞｰﾀ番号","type":"numeric"},{"id":"居住区","type":"text"},{"id":"年代","type":"numeric"},{"id":"性別","type":"text"},{"id":"問１","type":"numeric"},{"id":"問２","type":"numeric"},{"id":"問２自由記載","type":"text"},{"id":"問３","type":"numeric"},{"id":"問４","type":"numeric"},{"id":"問４自由記載","type":"text"},{"id":"問５","type":"numeric"},{"id":"問５自由記載","type":"text"},{"id":"問６","type":"numeric"},{"id":"問６自由記載","type":"text"},{"id":"問７","type":"numeric"},{"id":"問８","type":"numeric"},{"id":"問８自由記載","type":"text"},{"id":"問９","type":"numeric"},{"id":"問１０","type":"numeric"},{"id":"問１０自由記載","type":"text"},{"id":"問１１","type":"numeric"},{"id":"問１１自由記載","type":"text"},{"id":"問１２","type":"numeric"},{"id":"問１３自由記載","type":"text"}],
  "records": [
    [1,1,"瑞穂区",40,"女性",1,457,"",2,99,"",4,"",1,"",3,7,"",2,35,"",135,"",5,"99.0"],
    [2,2,"中区",50,"女性",1,12,"",1,5,"",2,"",5,"",2,246,"",2,3,"",137,"",2,"　なるべく早くつくるべきです。"],
    [3,3,"中川区",70,"男性",1,23,"",1,1,"",3,"",5,"",1,6,"",1,14,"",37,"",1,"99.0"],
    [4,4,"天白区",50,"女性",1,4,"",1,1,"",4,"",2,"",1,126,"",2,135,"",345,"",1,"99.0"],
    [5,5,"昭和区",40,"男性",1,25,"",1,1,"",3,"",3,"",5,235,"",2,234,"",345,"",3,"99.0"],
    [6,6,"緑区",70,"男性",1,34,"",1,1,"",4,"",2,"",1,236,"",2,15,"",134,"",4,"　他の交通機関より優先通行を可能にして、短時間・定時運行と言った機動力の重視・実現が必要と思う"],
    [7,7,"中村区",30,"男性",1,4,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",1,126,"",2,126,"",8,"",3,"99.0"],
    [8,8,"守山区",60,"男性",1,457,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",2,2,"",1,135,"",134,"",1,"　コンセプトを明確にして、既存の\n市営地下鉄や公共バスとの棲み分けを分かりやすくしてほしい。\nまた、タクシーなどの利用にも配慮がほしい。"],
    [9,9,"千種区",20,"男性",1,4,"",1,5,"",4,"",1,"",4,26,"",2,45,"",36,"",2,"99.0"],
    [10,10,"千種区",70,"女性",1,34,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",1,126,"",2,14,"",135,"",1,"99.0"],
    [11,11,"守山区",30,"女性",1,457,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",2,1356,"",2,147,"衝突事故などに強い頑丈な車両",149,"子供連れでも安心して待てる工夫がされている",2,"99.0"],
    [12,12,"瑞穂区",30,"女性",1,4,"",1,5,"",1,"",2,"",2,6,"",2,137,"金額が安い",157,"",2,"　○車両等の椅子について\n人との距離が近いと耐えきれないため仕切りがほしい\n○看板や標識について\n地下鉄の注意喚起を読まない人が多いため、標識や看板等のわかりやすさは勿論のこと周知するようにしてほしい。\n○デザイン性\nあまりにもおしゃれすぎるデザイン（トイレの男女マーク等）は分かりづらいためシンプルで誰もが理解できるデザイン性であってほしい。"],
    [13,13,"中村区",30,"女性",1,1234,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",1,256,"",2,12345,"",1234567,"",1,"99.0"],
    [14,14,"中村区",30,"男性",1,45,"",1,2,"",4,"",2,"",1,56,"",2,135,"",145,"",1,"99.0"],
    [15,15,"昭和区",20,"女性",1,34,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",3,6,"",2,17,"子ども連れやベビーカー、車椅子でも利用しやすい車両",134,"",2,"　子育てをしていて、公共交通機関の利用しにくさを実感しています。(広さ、利用者側の理解)\n公共交通機関を避けると自家用車での移動となってしまうので\nSRTではその辺りも考慮いただけますと幸いです。"],
    [16,16,"千種区",30,"女性",1,2347,"",1,1,"",1,"",2,"",2,6,"",2,4,"",137,"",4,"99.0"],
    [17,17,"緑区",40,"男性",1,7,"",1,1,"",6,"",1,"",4,7,"",2,4,"",13,"",3,"99.0"],
    [18,18,"中川区",70,"男性",1,34,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",2,126,"",1,15,"",14,"",2,"99.0"],
    [19,19,"東区",60,"男性",1,14,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",3,7,"",1,3,"",1,"",2,"99.0"],
    [20,20,"西区",30,"男性",1,27,"",1,1,"",1,"",2,"",1,7,"",1,245,"",147,"",1,"　期待しております。"],
    [21,21,"中村区",30,"男性",1,24,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",1,7,"",1,125,"",134,"",5,"　パーク＆ライドによる、駐車場からスムーズにＳＲＴの車両に乗車することが出来るしくみ作り。"],
    [22,22,"天白区",60,"女性",1,34,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",2,26,"",2,13,"",134,"",2,"99.0"],
    [23,23,"西区",60,"女性",1,7,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",3,2346,"",2,13,"",1345,"",2,"　本数が少なくて使えないものにならないように、広く乗りやすいもの、行き先等が分かり易いもの、換気対策ができているもの、安全なものをお願い致します。弱者に優しい事を優先して下さい。"],
    [24,24,"西区",30,"女性",1,47,"",2,99,"",99,"",99,"",3,358,"車道が狭く歩行者の多い道では、歩いている時に車が来ると、道の隅に寄らないといけないので鬱陶しく思うことがある。",2,137,"近未来を思わすデザイン",135,"",1,"　市営バスはどのバスが、どこに発着するのか分かりにくい。\nそのバスに乗るには、どのバス停に行けば良いのかも分かりにくいので、SRTはそのところを分かりやすくしてほしい。"],
    [25,25,"南区",40,"女性",1,47,"",2,99,"",4,"",99,"",3,7,"",2,135,"",139,"足腰が悪いので、そういった人が休みやすい場所",1,"99.0"],
    [26,26,"瑞穂区",70,"女性",1,4,"",1,1,"",4,"",2,"",1,126,"",2,23,"",145,"",1,"　若くないので足が丈夫なうちに乗ってみたいです"],
    [27,27,"中川区",30,"女性",1,4,"",1,1,"",1,"",5,"",3,56,"",2,345,"",134,"",2,"99.0"],
    [28,28,"東区",40,"女性",1,247,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",1,135,"",2,134,"",346,"",2,"　今走っている市バスとは違うと思いますが、たまに市バスの運転手さんが無愛想だったり、不親切だったり、危険な割り込みをされる方がいるので、そういうことのないような、名古屋を楽しめるような乗り物にしてほしいです。"],
    [29,29,"中区",40,"男性",1,14,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",1,356,"",1,123,"",134,"",1,"99.0"],
    [30,30,"千種区",40,"男性",1,23,"",1,5,"",2,"",6,"コロナ対策",1,256,"",1,134,"",456,"",2,"99.0"],
    [31,31,"緑区",70,"男性",1,45,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",1,126,"",2,134,"",134,"",2,"99.0"],
    [32,32,"港区",50,"男性",1,46,"",1,1,"",4,"",6,"運行時間が正確で、移動時間が短く、高コスパであるから。また、豪雨や台風に対して耐性が強いこともポイントとなるから。",5,68,"信号機のない交差点での運転手の歩行者優先意識が低く、危険性が高いところです。",2,135,"",134,"",1,"　車利用が多い本市で、今でも都心部では自動車が混雑しているが、車線増加等の対策を講ぜずに、現在の道路を活用して、自動車とＳＲＴとの共存に向けた具体策の説明が過去の資料になく、イメージがわかないので、方策やその方向性等を示してほしい。まだ無いなら、そこを各分野の専門家等を含めて議論した時の情報や考え方等を市民に提供してほしい。"],
    [33,33,"中村区",40,"男性",1,57,"",1,1,"",5,"",1,"",1,26,"",1,145,"",126,"",1,"　SRTが整備されれば混雑が少し減るのかな。と思う"],
    [34,34,"名東区",30,"女性",1,12,"",1,1,"",1,"",2,"",1,25,"",1,35,"",35,"",2,"99.0"],
    [35,35,"緑区",20,"女性",1,7,"",1,1,"",6,"",5,"",4,1,"",2,1,"",14,"",2,"99.0"],
    [36,36,"北区",40,"女性",2,57,"",1,5,"",1,"",5,"",3,7,"",2,123,"",145,"",5,"99.0"],
    [37,37,"天白区",30,"男性",1,47,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",2,36,"",1,134,"",147,"",3,"　渋滞に巻き込まれず、定時運行性を確保することが重要になると思う"],
    [38,38,"名東区",20,"女性",1,34,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",2,6,"",1,135,"",145,"",2,"99.0"],
    [39,39,"中区",70,"男性",1,14,"",1,4,"",1,"",6,"ウォーキングコースの一つ",2,568,"自動車、自転車及び歩行者それぞれ交通ルール遵守教育の徹底",2,123,"",145,"",3,"　先ずは啓蒙活動の一つとして導入したい。(態度で訴えたい)"],
    [40,40,"中区",70,"男性",1,34,"",1,5,"",3,"",3,"",1,236,"",1,135,"",145,"",1,"　早く実現してほしい"],
    [41,41,"千種区",50,"男性",1,247,"",1,5,"",4,"",1,"",3,6,"",2,134,"",135,"",1,"99.0"],
    [42,42,"北区",70,"男性",1,34,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",1,236,"",2,123,"",134,"",1,"　SRTが機能していくためには、道路整備と流入車両の制限が必要となるでしょう。その場合には、自家用車で来られる方のために車両の駐車場を確保することも必要となるのではないでしょうか。"],
    [43,43,"瑞穂区",30,"女性",1,47,"",2,99,"",4,"",1,"",2,256,"",2,345,"",135,"",2,"99.0"],
    [44,44,"熱田区",40,"男性",1,25,"",1,3,"",2,"",2,"",1,6,"",2,125,"",134,"",1,"　諸外国ではよくある交通システムなので、地下鉄による名古屋－栄間の移動よりも移動しやすく、地上からの移動にも便利である。ぜひ実現してほしい"],
    [45,45,"港区",50,"女性",1,5,"",1,1,"",4,"",2,"",2,6,"",2,15,"",134,"",2,"99.0"],
    [46,46,"名東区",70,"男性",1,47,"",2,99,"",99,"",99,"",5,26,"",2,6,"",367,"",5,"99.0"],
    [47,47,"昭和区",60,"男性",1,3478,"",1,1,"",4,"",2,"",4,23456,"",2,457,"未来の路面電車",134567,"",2,"　便利で安全快適に"],
    [48,48,"緑区",30,"女性",1,47,"",2,99,"",99,"",99,"",3,56,"",2,134,"",134,"",2,"99.0"],
    [49,49,"緑区",60,"女性",1,5,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",3,234,"",2,124,"",146,"",5,"99.0"],
    [50,50,"北区",20,"女性",1,45,"",1,5,"",1,"",2,"",3,256,"",2,157,"地下鉄より安い乗車賃",349,"広いトイレやゴミ箱がある",2,"99.0"],
    [51,51,"北区",20,"女性",1,14,"",1,5,"",1,"",2,"",2,6,"",2,5,"",134,"",2,"99.0"],
    [52,52,"西区",60,"女性",1,47,"",1,1,"",4,"",6,"移動先に安い駐車場が無いから",3,8,"信号の連携が悪い。久屋通りを横断するのに徒歩だと信号を2回待たないと渡り切れない。",2,134,"",145,"",1,"　とにかく早く実行して欲しい。20年後ではこの目で見ることができな違かもしれない。"],
    [53,53,"東区",30,"女性",1,14,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",1,156,"",2,135,"",135,"",1,"99.0"],
    [54,54,"中川区",30,"男性",1,47,"",1,1,"",4,"",6,"使い慣れているから",4,56,"",2,47,"タイムリーに運行してくれる。乗り降りがしやすい。支払い方法が簡単・シンプル。",134,"",2,"　気軽に使用しやすい運賃設定と、シニア世代へいかに利用を浸透させられるかが大事だと思う。"],
    [55,55,"熱田区",40,"男性",1,14,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",1,12,"",2,123,"",135,"",5,"　SRT構想は、バスの乗車人数を超える大型移動手段となることから期待しております。ただ、車両の大型化に伴い何らかの道路規制や道路工事は不可避となると思われます。観光客の方たちだけでなく地元の人たちにも利便性を強く感じる施策をお願いします。"],
    [56,56,"天白区",60,"男性",1,47,"",1,5,"",1,"",5,"",1,7,"",2,35,"",147,"",5,"99.0"],
    [57,57,"天白区",30,"男性",1,47,"",1,5,"",4,"",5,"",4,7,"",2,15,"",49,"空調設備",1,"　コストを安くしてほしい"],
    [58,58,"中村区",30,"女性",1,13567,"",1,1,"",3,"",4,"",2,1,"",2,134,"",256,"",2,"99.0"],
    [59,59,"南区",50,"男性",1,38,"",1,1,"",3,"",4,"",2,126,"",2,145,"",467,"",1,"　期待していますが、現状でも基幹バスレーンを平気で走る車がいる中、ドライバーのマナーをどうするかが課題と思います"],
    [60,60,"中川区",40,"女性",1,5,"",1,3,"",4,"",1,"",3,25,"",2,123,"",134,"",1,"　初めて知りました。地下鉄は乗り換えがありすぎて、大変な時もあります。便利に快適に利用できるものを楽しみにしてます。"],
    [61,61,"中区",30,"女性",1,45,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",5,8,"回収するのが大変だとは思うが、ゴミ箱がないかと探す時が結構ある。",2,137,"車内で携帯などの充電ができる。",135,"",2,"　遠方からレンタカーや自家用車で来た方達が、都心に行く時に、SRTに乗り換えれるように、駐車スペースもあるといいと思う。"],
    [62,62,"東区",20,"男性",1,23,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",2,8,"広い道路が多く、横断歩道が少ない。",1,145,"",346,"",1,"　是非実現していただきたいと強く願っています。"],
    [63,63,"天白区",40,"女性",1,47,"",1,5,"",4,"",1,"",2,256,"",2,147,"お金がかからないこと",147,"",1,"　普段都心へいかない人達にも\nわかりやすく情報を発信して欲しい。"],
    [64,64,"守山区",60,"女性",1,35,"",2,99,"",99,"",99,"",2,235,"",2,135,"",134,"",1,"　名古屋っておしゃれ、と言われるデザインを公募してみたら？"],
    [65,65,"名東区",40,"女性",1,37,"",1,4,"",1,"",5,"",1,134,"",1,137,"値段が安い",134,"",1,"　私にとっては徒歩で動ける距離なので、徒歩のようにフレキシブルな動線で、地下鉄やバスより安い料金でなければ、なかなか利用しないかな、と思ってしまいます。町の景観を微妙にしている車や路駐だらけのごちゃごちゃした道路がSRTが走ることによってスマートな街並みになればいいなと思います。"],
    [66,66,"中川区",70,"男性",1,24,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",5,7,"",2,23,"",134,"",5,"99.0"],
    [67,67,"緑区",40,"女性",1,4,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",5,28,"日陰になるベンチがあるとありがたいです",2,13,"",457,"",5,"　気軽にお出かけ出来るよう、名古屋市在住者の特典で、運賃が割引になるサービスがあるとありがたいです"],
    [68,68,"天白区",40,"女性",1,7,"",2,99,"",99,"",5,"",2,124,"",2,134,"",12,"",2,"99.0"],
    [69,69,"千種区",50,"女性",1,47,"",2,99,"",99,"",99,"",5,6,"",2,134,"",13457,"",1,"99.0"],
    [70,70,"北区",60,"女性",1,45,"",1,1,"",1,"",5,"",2,26,"",2,134,"",345,"",2,"99.0"],
    [71,71,"東区",50,"女性",1,47,"",1,5,"",6,"",1,"",2,126,"",1,135,"",167,"",2,"　斬新や洗練デザインにはこだわりなく、他の部分などコスト削減してほしくない部分へ回してほしい。"],
    [72,72,"東区",70,"男性",1,24,"",1,5,"",2,"",5,"",2,126,"",2,134,"",134,"",1,"　本数が多く待ち時間が少なく移動に便利なこと。街並みがきれいで車窓の景色が楽しいものだと良いなと思います。"],
    [73,73,"昭和区",50,"男性",1,34,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",4,7,"",2,13,"",13,"",3,"99.0"],
    [74,74,"瑞穂区",40,"男性",1,46,"",1,1,"",4,"",2,"",1,256,"",2,14,"",13456,"",5,"　色々大変そう"],
    [75,75,"緑区",40,"男性",1,57,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",1,245,"",2,245,"",137,"",1,"99.0"],
    [76,76,"守山区",50,"女性",1,57,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",5,23,"",2,34,"",146,"",2,"99.0"],
    [77,77,"中区",60,"女性",1,146,"",1,5,"",4,"",1,"",2,126,"",2,123,"",146,"",1,"99.0"],
    [78,78,"北区",50,"女性",1,3,"",1,4,"",3,"",3,"",1,2,"",2,134,"",135,"",2,"99.0"],
    [79,79,"中川区",50,"女性",1,45,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",2,26,"",2,13,"",145,"",5,"　都心に行くと、路上駐車をする人が多く、車で移動する際にとても運転しづらいです。\nどこに計画されているのか分かりませんが、路上駐車されている車を何とかしないと、無理がある様な気がします。\nまた、路面電車をやめて地下鉄になったはずなのに、今更、路面電車？と言う気もします。"],
    [80,80,"中区",50,"男性",1,124,"",1,5,"",1,"",5,"",2,26,"",2,145,"",13457,"",1,"　まずは都心からだとは思いますが、早々に熱田神宮にも行けるようにして欲しいです。\nまた、ド派手な文化名古屋ですから、横浜の様に、都心にロープウェイ(ゴンドラ？)を通すなど、単なるバスの延長じゃないものも考えて欲しいです。"],
    [81,81,"北区",50,"男性",1,3,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",3,57,"",2,14,"",145,"",2,"99.0"],
    [82,82,"南区",70,"女性",1,45,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",2,246,"",2,137,"俗にいう「名古屋のイメージ」にこだわらない(!!)すっきりしたスマートでセンスの良さをアピールした車両",137,"",2,"　障碍者や高齢者に対する配慮が十分なされたい。(特に安全)\n\n地下鉄の乗降に車いす利用者は駅員の補助が必要な方が多いのを見かけると、利用しやすくすることが大事であると思う\n\n一日券もしくは市民は半年定期もしくは1年パスのようにし、カードもしくはスマホ画面のタッチで利用できるといい\n\n収入などに応じて料金設定する\n\nSRTの推進の検討に加えて、自転車道については都心部ではカラー舗装をして車歩行者分離をすすめてはどうか。"],
    [83,83,"緑区",40,"女性",2,99,"",99,99,"",99,"",99,"",2,2,"",2,13,"",137,"",2,"99.0"],
    [84,84,"緑区",70,"男性",1,34,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",2,26,"",2,24,"",134,"",5,"　観光客にも分かり易く、利用しやすく。"],
    [85,85,"北区",70,"女性",1,47,"",1,2,"",6,"",1,"",2,126,"",1,134,"",137,"",2,"99.0"],
    [86,86,"天白区",50,"女性",1,14,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",2,7,"",2,135,"",134,"",1,"　素敵な構想ですね。ぜひ実現化して下さい。"],
    [87,87,"中川区",40,"女性",1,345,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",2,256,"",2,134,"",145,"",1,"99.0"],
    [88,88,"南区",70,"女性",1,45,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",2,23,"",2,12,"",136,"",1,"　懐かしい場所が新しくなってさみしい事もありますが、あたらしい現代的な設備・わくわくする空間を期待したいです。"],
    [89,89,"中川区",40,"男性",1,45,"",1,4,"",4,"",1,"",1,8,"交通マナーが悪いし路上喫煙禁止なのに喫煙所がない",1,134,"",123,"",2,"99.0"],
    [90,90,"緑区",50,"男性",1,4,"",1,1,"",4,"",4,"",1,5,"",2,13,"",12,"",1,"99.0"],
    [91,91,"熱田区",70,"女性",1,345,"",1,1,"",3,"",3,"",2,6,"",2,4,"",5,"",2,"99.0"],
    [92,92,"天白区",50,"男性",1,47,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",2,26,"",1,15,"",134,"",1,"99.0"],
    [93,93,"昭和区",70,"男性",1,3,"",1,5,"",4,"",1,"",2,234,"",2,134,"",135,"",1,"　SRTのルート範囲に限り自動車の通行制限を設けた方が良い。（例）ＳＲＴ優先道路の設置等\nＳＲＴの便利性を出すためには運行間隔15分以下がベター。また一日乗車券の設定が必要（＜1コイン（500円）以下の価格）"],
    [94,94,"名東区",60,"女性",1,47,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",1,6,"",2,135,"",347,"",2,"　詳しいことを知らないので、特にない。"],
    [95,95,"中川区",20,"女性",1,47,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",1,125,"",2,1,"",145,"",1,"99.0"],
    [96,96,"千種区",40,"女性",1,47,"",1,1,"",6,"",6,"買い物した荷物を持ち歩きたくないから",3,56,"",2,125,"",136,"",1,"　乗り場にゴミがたまらない無いようになど、車内だけでなくその他のことも考えて進めてほしい"],
    [97,97,"中区",30,"女性",1,34,"",1,1,"",1,"",5,"",2,236,"",2,134,"",134,"",4,"99.0"],
    [98,98,"緑区",40,"女性",1,7,"",1,5,"",6,"",5,"",2,6,"",2,134,"",145,"",1,"　都心内は、自家用車の乗入れを制限して電車のようなもののみを動かせばいいと思う\nそれには、その手前に十分な駐車場やそこに行くまでのバスや電車をより発達させなければならないと思う"],
    [99,99,"昭和区",60,"女性",1,34,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",5,146,"",2,234,"",134,"",3,"99.0"],
    [100,100,"瑞穂区",20,"女性",1,14,"",1,5,"",1,"",2,"",3,26,"",2,134,"",457,"",1,"　地下鉄や市営バスとの差別化を図って、より便利で快適でバリアフリーな公共交通機関にしてほしい。"],
    [101,101,"緑区",70,"男性",1,47,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",2,236,"",1,134,"",15,"",2,"　将来を考え夢のある計画を実現して欲しい。"],
    [102,102,"東区",60,"女性",1,34,"",1,5,"",2,"",5,"",2,6,"",2,234,"",345,"",3,"　バスの路線がわかりにくくて、利用しにくいので、自宅近くの決まった路線しか利用してない。わかりやすいと高低さがなく、地下鉄より、利便さが、あるよう思う。メグールとSRTの差があまりわからない。"],
    [103,103,"港区",40,"女性",1,347,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",2,18,"チラシを配られたり、声をかけられるのが嫌だ。",2,1,"",135,"",3,"　郊外と都市部を結ぶものであれば、良いと思いますが、都市部の移動手段としては難しいと思う。\nここにお金をかけるのであれば、多すぎる都市部の車の慢性的な渋滞緩和をどうにかして欲しいと思う。"],
    [104,104,"名東区",60,"女性",1,34,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",2,46,"",2,35,"",145,"",2,"99.0"],
    [105,105,"昭和区",70,"女性",1,34,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",3,24,"",1,345,"",135,"",3,"99.0"],
    [106,106,"北区",20,"男性",1,4,"",1,5,"",4,"",2,"",1,26,"",2,15,"",14,"",1,"99.0"],
    [107,107,"北区",60,"男性",1,34,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",1,6,"",1,234,"",134,"",2,"　車の制限はできないと思うので、SRTが優先的に通行できるようにしてほしい。"],
    [108,108,"熱田区",30,"男性",1,124,"",1,5,"",2,"",4,"",1,156,"",2,134,"",134,"",2,"99.0"],
    [109,109,"守山区",40,"女性",1,57,"",1,1,"",6,"",5,"",5,7,"",2,145,"",134,"",5,"99.0"],
    [110,110,"南区",60,"男性",1,35,"",2,99,"",4,"",6,"バスはあてにならない",1,168,"横断時に車のマナーが悪い",2,3,"",134,"",4,"　導入によって、交通渋滞はどのようになるのか？\n導入エリアでは、一般車を締め出すぐらいの策が必要でしょう。"],
    [111,111,"東区",30,"男性",1,45,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",3,2,"",2,3,"",467,"",2,"99.0"],
    [112,112,"瑞穂区",30,"男性",1,45,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",1,36,"",2,45,"",134,"",4,"99.0"],
    [113,113,"南区",60,"女性",1,14,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",1,126,"",2,7,"協議されつくされていないことと、今のところSRTがなくても不便はない事。この交通システムを導入することで失うものが知りたい。誰が得をするのでしょうか。",8,"",4,"　今存在する乗り物を活かす方法を考えてほしい。無駄に大切な税金を使って欲しくない。これからの人達に負の遺産は、これ以上要らない。使われなくなった交通機関をよく見てください。例えば、桃花台にまだある鉄骨の大量に残された遺物。名古屋市の物ではないが、遺物にならないとも限らないので慎重に慎重を重ねて広く協議しても遅くないのではと思います。"],
    [114,114,"港区",30,"女性",1,3457,"",1,1,"",4,"",5,"",1,125,"",1,345,"",124,"",1,"99.0"],
    [115,115,"港区",40,"男性",1,47,"",1,2,"",6,"",5,"",1,2,"",2,34,"",356,"",1,"　名古屋市では地下鉄が少ないですし、今後増える可能性も少ないと思うので、\n新たな交通手段は素晴らしいと思います。"],
    [116,116,"中川区",20,"女性",1,2345,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",4,125,"",2,1,"",1,"",2,"99.0"],
    [117,117,"西区",40,"男性",1,2347,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",1,246,"",2,145,"",145,"",1,"99.0"],
    [118,118,"緑区",40,"男性",1,37,"",1,1,"",6,"",5,"",3,6,"",2,345,"",135,"",2,"99.0"],
    [119,119,"中川区",40,"女性",1,45,"",1,1,"",1,"",6,"色々な町並みを見ながら、時には気軽に立ち寄りながら移動出来るから",1,25,"",2,135,"",137,"",1,"99.0"],
    [120,120,"名東区",40,"男性",1,34,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",5,15,"",2,34,"",345,"",1,"　新たな設備投資を行うよりも、既存の交通手段（地下鉄・バス）を拡充して運用できないのでしょうか？また、運転や維持管理に税金が投入されるため、観光とタイアップし利益をあげる施策も同時に検討してください。"],
    [121,121,"名東区",50,"男性",1,4,"",1,1,"",4,"",2,"",1,8,"地下鉄乗り換え駅までが少し遠いと感じる",1,134,"",1345,"",2,"　市バスとの差別化、また黒字化へのバス路線との綿密な路線計画が必要と思われる。"],
    [122,122,"名東区",60,"女性",1,47,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",3,26,"",2,7,"段差がないもの",135,"",1,"　段差をなくすなど、車いすやベビーカーでも自力で乗り降りできる車両がいいと思う"],
    [123,123,"港区",30,"女性",1,4,"",2,99,"",99,"",99,"",3,156,"",2,1,"",134,"",3,"99.0"],
    [124,124,"天白区",30,"男性",1,27,"",1,1,"",2,"",5,"",1,126,"",1,124,"",135,"",1,"99.0"],
    [125,125,"緑区",40,"男性",1,4,"",2,99,"",99,"",99,"",1,126,"",2,135,"",134,"",2,"99.0"],
    [126,126,"名東区",50,"女性",1,34,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",2,126,"",2,134,"",134,"",2,"99.0"],
    [127,127,"中村区",20,"女性",1,1234567,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",1,12356,"",2,134,"",345,"",1,"99.0"],
    [128,128,"北区",30,"女性",1,347,"",1,5,"",1,"",2,"",3,2568,"ベビーカーなど子連れに優しさを感じない",2,13,"",134567,"",1,"　ベビーカーや子連れにも優しい環境になるよう期待します！"],
    [129,129,"南区",50,"女性",1,345,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",1,6,"",2,134,"",134,"",2,"　便利だなとは思いましたが、利用する人が少ない時間が多いと赤字になってその穴埋めが税金として市民にこないか心配です。料金が高くなるとますます乗る人も少なくなると思うので乗ると何かお店の割引があるとか何回か乗ると一回分無料で乗れるとかあると乗る人も増えるのではないかと思いました。"],
    [130,130,"天白区",40,"男性",1,347,"",1,5,"",6,"",5,"",3,25,"",2,345,"",14,"",4,"99.0"],
    [131,131,"中村区",20,"女性",1,4,"",1,5,"",1,"",2,"",2,6,"",2,13,"",134,"",2,"99.0"],
    [132,132,"熱田区",70,"男性",1,24,"",1,4,"",2,"",5,"",3,246,"",1,6,"",8,"",5,"99.0"],
    [133,133,"緑区",50,"男性",1,47,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",1,136,"",1,147,"お年寄りや体の不自由な方でも乗り降りのしやすい、バリアフリーな車両",345,"",2,"　・地下鉄の短区間利用（名古屋駅～伏見～栄の相互間）や、都心ループバスの代替交通機関になり得ると思います。\n・道路の広い名古屋市では、比較的整備がし易い感を持ちます。"],
    [134,134,"熱田区",60,"男性",1,45,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",1,136,"",1,134,"",147,"",1,"99.0"],
    [135,135,"瑞穂区",30,"男性",1,4,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",2,6,"",1,3,"",134,"",2,"99.0"],
    [136,136,"北区",70,"女性",1,45,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",2,346,"",2,134,"",14,"",2,"99.0"],
    [137,137,"中村区",30,"男性",1,4,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",3,235,"",2,3,"",156,"",2,"　安全で便利になるのであればどんどん進めてほしいです。"],
    [138,138,"緑区",50,"女性",1,4,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",1,267,"",1,123,"",145,"",2,"　ディズニーランドのオフィシャルホテル間をつなぐシャトルバスのような、子どもたちが喜ぶキャラクター性があるといいと思う。\nジブリパークもできるし、\n愛知が流行りのアニメの聖地、発信の地として、人流が活発になると賑わえるのではないか?\nキャラクターを固定せずに期間限定で替えるラッピングバスみないなのも楽しい。\nニジサンジなどのラッピング広告なんか、若い世代は狙って乗りに来ると思う。\n子どもや若い世代、ファミリーがちょっと行ってみようかな、と思える場所が少ないので、休日はみんなイオンに集合してしまう。\n栄周辺のデパートには、用がないとなかなか出向かないし魅力がない"],
    [139,139,"熱田区",70,"男性",1,34,"",1,4,"",4,"",1,"",1,6,"",1,6,"",14,"",4,"　利用見込み\n・必要理由に東山線名駅～栄間の混雑をあげているが、この間のみの利用者がどれだけＳＲＴに移動するかが重要な要素と思う。\n　通勤利用者からは定時性、乗継を含む所要時間の短さ、確実に乗車できるか、において地下鉄との比較となるので、ここでＳＲＴが優位となるかの評価が必要。\n・名駅から観光名所の名古屋城、大須を対象とする循環線はメーグルの改良で対応することの検討も欲しい。\n\n専用レーン\n・専用レーンを車道の端に設ける場合は駐停車車両およびタクシー乗降の排除、自転車走行との交絡が課題となる。\n　一方車道の中央部に設ける場合は現在の基幹バスレーンが参考になるが、ここでは右折レーンより中央寄りにも直進レーンがあるため直感的に違和感があり、また交差点付近ではレーン幅が狭くなっていて接触の危険を感じる。専用レーンは十分な幅員のある道路に限定して設置することが必要。\n\n車両の仕様\n・ガイドウェイバスのように特殊な車両を採用すると更新時の後継に困ることとなるので、長期運用の視点から汎用性のある車両を選択されたい。"],
    [140,140,"名東区",30,"女性",1,4,"",2,99,"",99,"",99,"",5,6,"",2,3,"",13,"",3,"99.0"],
    [141,141,"瑞穂区",50,"女性",1,34,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",2,125,"",2,137,"本数が多い",137,"",2,"99.0"],
    [142,142,"昭和区",20,"女性",1,1457,"",1,1,"",1,"",2,"",3,7,"",2,1345,"",139,"ベビーカーなどのせやすい",1,"　障害者、妊婦、赤ちゃんや子連れすべての人がのりやすいといいと思います。車両だけでなく、環境も。\n公共交通機関はいまでも上記の人が利用できますが、手間だったり一般客からの目線が気になるときがあります。"],
    [143,143,"名東区",70,"男性",1,34,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",2,23,"",2,34,"",14,"",2,"　予算面で大変厳しいのではないかと心配です。"],
    [144,144,"南区",30,"女性",1,35,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",2,2,"",2,1345,"",1345,"",3,"99.0"],
    [145,145,"熱田区",40,"男性",1,4567,"",1,5,"",1,"",5,"",3,456,"",2,4,"",27,"",2,"　とくになし"],
    [146,146,"瑞穂区",40,"男性",1,25,"",1,5,"",2,"",4,"",2,6,"",1,134,"",134,"",2,"99.0"],
    [147,147,"瑞穂区",70,"男性",1,24,"",1,5,"",4,"",1,"",2,235,"",2,125,"",367,"",2,"　自家用車で移動することが多いのですが、自家用車より便利で快適な交通手段があれば利用したいです。"],
    [148,148,"瑞穂区",70,"女性",1,34,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",1,256,"",2,124,"",157,"",2,"　快適に移動ができる環境が早く整うと良いと思います。"],
    [149,149,"守山区",60,"女性",1,45,"",1,1,"",1,"",5,"",1,268,"給水所も有ると、うれしい。",2,247,"市バス路線以外を、きめ細かく走行希望",156,"",1,"　期待します。\n待合場所で休憩が出来るなんて素敵です。"],
    [150,150,"中川区",20,"女性",1,457,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",5,56,"",2,15,"",8,"",5,"99.0"],
    [151,151,"緑区",60,"男性",1,34,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",1,246,"",2,245,"",134,"",1,"　世界の有名な観光都市には路面電車が活躍しており、観光都市「なごや」を目指すならば、街のアイデンティティとしてSRTシステムは不可欠であると考えられます。また、都心エリアに限定して無料（市民・観光客も含めて）で利用できれば、自家用車の流入も抑制出来ると思います。"],
    [152,152,"守山区",50,"女性",1,4,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",5,56,"",2,1,"",135,"",2,"99.0"],
    [153,153,"中村区",40,"女性",1,24,"",1,1,"",2,"",5,"",2,56,"",2,3,"",134,"",2,"99.0"],
    [154,154,"中川区",70,"女性",1,34,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",2,126,"",1,134,"",135,"",2,"　資料を見ると10年前から計画している。あとどの位かかると出来上がるのですか？\n70才過ぎてるので生きている間に、乗ってみたいです。\n水素燃料のバスに乗った事あります。すごく静かでした。\nでも水素燃料造るのは、大変そうです。"],
    [155,155,"守山区",50,"男性",1,27,"",1,1,"",2,"",2,"",1,6,"",2,1,"",135,"",1,"　移動する車両のシートは、高級感は無くても良いので、１人分が座れるスペースを１．５人分の広めで、ゆったりが良いと思います。\n移動時間が短くても、何か、余裕を持ったゆったり感を演出していただけると嬉しいですね。\n乗車人数が少なくなるという欠点もありますが、その分、本数を増やしては、いかがでしょうか。\n「余裕」という別の意味での高級感を味わえるのではないかと思います。"],
    [156,156,"東区",70,"男性",1,45,"",1,1,"",4,"",2,"",1,126,"",2,134,"",135,"",2,"99.0"],
    [157,157,"北区",40,"男性",1,124,"",1,2,"",2,"",2,"",2,1,"",2,25,"",3,"",2,"99.0"],
    [158,158,"中川区",60,"男性",1,45,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",3,6,"",2,15,"",34,"",2,"　イメージがまだわきません。"],
    [159,159,"昭和区",70,"男性",1,34,"",1,5,"",4,"",1,"",1,248,"歩行者と車両の空間が混在して落ち着いてリラックスした環境にない。歩行者の歩く所や休憩所は車両の空間とは別の階層になるといいと思います。車両は地下層を走行するようにする。",2,137,"移動手段として特化したもの。存在感・シンボル性は余り重要でない。安心・安全な乗り物であれば良い。",357,"",4,"　運航は従来の交通機関とは、全く別のシステムを採用して、AIなどを利用した、全自動化が望ましい。\n急いで導入するより、近未来的な都市構想にマッチしたシステムが良い、新しいことを始める度に構造・構成を整えるのは無駄が多すぎる。少なくても長期的な展望にたって、都市全体のことを考えて欲しい。"],
    [160,160,"中川区",30,"女性",1,5,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",4,7,"",2,1,"",1,"",2,"99.0"],
    [161,161,"名東区",30,"男性",1,47,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",2,56,"",2,134,"",134,"",1,"99.0"],
    [162,162,"中川区",50,"男性",2,5,"",2,99,"",6,"",5,"",2,2,"",2,1,"",1,"",2,"99.0"],
    [163,163,"中川区",20,"男性",1,4,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",2,2,"",2,6,"",2,"",2,"99.0"],
    [164,164,"港区",60,"女性",1,4,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",2,26,"",2,123,"",145,"",2,"99.0"],
    [165,165,"港区",20,"男性",1,5,"",2,99,"",4,"",1,"",2,456,"",2,134,"",136,"",2,"99.0"],
    [166,166,"緑区",30,"男性",1,45,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",3,125,"",1,1,"",134,"",2,"99.0"],
    [167,167,"瑞穂区",40,"男性",1,47,"",1,5,"",1,"",5,"",2,168,"子連れだと、急なトイレやおむつ替えの対応にこまる。",2,145,"",179,"すべての待合空間に完備されてほしいとまでは言わないが、トイレ。",1,"　これは、ぜひ市民の生活と名古屋市外からの消費の呼び込みの兼ね合いについて、十分に検討して進めてほしいと思います。\n\nまず、外から名古屋に遊びや観光、ショッピングに来る人にとっては有用な案だと思います。\n\n一方で、市民からするとやはり、名駅地域と栄・大須地域とは、どちらも用途がかぶっているか、もしくはどちらか単体で用が足るため、基本的に行き来しないとも思います。\nSRTを導入することによって、一般車両（物流や社用車を含む）の通行が不便になり、結局、交通渋滞が解消されない、ということにもなりかねない点は懸念されます。なぜならは、SRTが予定されているルート外から、都心部へ車で向かう人が、SRTの導入で受けるメリットが見えにくいからです。\nたとえば、現在都心部へ車で向かう人は、都心部での買い物の荷物や、各種イベントへの参加の荷物があるからこそ、自家用車で向かうということがあります。また、市内であっても乗り換えが不便だとか、家族で移動する場合だと自家用車を選びやすいのではないでしょうか。\nそうすると、自家用車とSRTの接続も併せて検討していただく方がよいようとおもいます。\n\nこう考えると、都心部への自家用車の乗り入れが減れば、物流車やその他社用車はSRTによって車線が減っても滞留することは無いように感じます。"],
    [168,168,"千種区",70,"女性",1,4,"",1,1,"デパートに用事がある",4,"",1,"",2,346,"",2,14,"",135,"",1,"　今まで知らなかった言葉ですが、地上を走る乗り物ですよね。今でも車が渋滞している中で、現実的ではないような気がしますが、どうなんでしょうね。地下鉄の栄から名古屋は大変混雑してます。この交通機関が現実的になれば、地下鉄の緩和になることを期待します。本当はもっと栄と名古屋間を利用したいのですが、あの混雑が二の足を踏んでます。"],
    [169,169,"中川区",30,"男性",1,457,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",3,8,"人が多い",2,147,"金色の車両",134,"",2,"99.0"],
    [170,170,"西区",50,"男性",1,23,"",1,4,"",2,"",5,"",3,235,"",2,124,"",345,"",5,"99.0"],
    [171,171,"瑞穂区",40,"男性",1,4,"",1,5,"",1,"",5,"",2,16,"",2,134,"",134,"",2,"　足の不自由な方でも乗りやすい段差の少ない車両にしていただきたく思います。\nまた、SRTの整備を行うのであれば、自転車専用道路、歩道の拡大などの整備もあわせておこなうことができればよいです。\n歩道の拡大は難しいでしょうが、自転車専用道路だけでも整備すれば、歩道を走行する自転車がすくなくなるため、\n自転車と歩行者が同じ歩道を利用するといったことがなくなって歩行者も安心して歩行できるようになると思います。\nSRTの意見とはちょっと違いますがあわせて検討していただければ幸いです。"],
    [172,172,"守山区",60,"男性",1,57,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",4,56,"",2,15,"",134,"",1,"99.0"],
    [173,173,"北区",70,"男性",1,34,"",1,5,"",4,"",2,"",2,236,"",2,123,"",134,"",2,"99.0"],
    [174,174,"熱田区",40,"女性",1,57,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",2,126,"",2,145,"",134,"",3,"　名古屋駅から他方向は行く手段として新しい交通機関ができるのはいいことだと思うが日常的に車を必要とし、利用している人が困らない(例えば道路が渋滞してしまうとか)ないようにしてほしい。"],
    [175,175,"東区",30,"女性",1,2,"",1,4,"",2,"",5,"",2,123,"",1,13,"",1456,"",1,"99.0"],
    [176,176,"港区",60,"男性",1,7,"",1,1,"",6,"",5,"",3,236,"",2,345,"",456,"",2,"99.0"],
    [177,177,"中川区",40,"男性",1,2347,"",1,5,"",4,"",1,"",2,2,"",1,145,"",36,"",2,"　都心のバスの運行本数を減らすか検討が必要。都心以外の地域ではバスが必要なので、乗り継ぎの方法、料金を優遇するなどの検討が必要だと思います。"],
    [178,178,"西区",50,"女性",1,4,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",1,256,"",2,134,"",157,"",1,"99.0"],
    [179,179,"中村区",70,"男性",1,34,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",4,234,"",1,7,"必要なし、その費用で現状の交通手段の改善進めるべき！",8,"",4,"　Q10と同文。必要なし、その費用で現状の交通手段の改善進めるべき！\n自動車交通の妨げになる。"],
    [180,180,"西区",60,"男性",1,34,"",1,5,"",1,"",5,"",1,6,"",2,135,"",134,"",1,"　地下鉄より建設費が安くて良い！"],
    [181,181,"中川区",60,"男性",1,35,"",1,3,"",3,"",2,"",1,6,"",1,15,"",134,"",1,"　完全に、専用軌道にしないと、意味がないです。"],
    [182,182,"千種区",30,"女性",1,24,"",2,99,"",99,"",99,"",2,125,"",2,1357,"料金が安い",35,"",3,"　実現したら未来感のある街になりそう。それまでにはたくさんの時間やお金がかかりそうなので、市民に負担のないようにしてもらえたらありがたい。実現したら乗ってみたいのでできるだけ低価格でお願いしたい。"],
    [183,183,"北区",40,"男性",1,47,"",1,5,"",4,"",1,"",2,26,"",2,145,"",135,"",2,"99.0"],
    [184,184,"緑区",40,"男性",1,47,"",1,1,"",4,"",2,"",1,26,"",1,345,"",137,"",1,"　利用者に対してできるだけ分かりやすく使いやすいシステムにしてほしい。"],
    [185,185,"天白区",30,"女性",1,34,"",1,5,"",1,"",2,"",2,2,"",2,123,"",135,"",2,"　待つ場所、車内が人でいっぱいになってしまうと感染症が気になってしまいます。"],
    [186,186,"千種区",40,"男性",1,47,"",1,5,"",1,"",2,"",3,7,"",1,14,"",126,"",3,"　車社会の名古屋において車線を1つつぶしてSRTを新設するとなると都心の車の渋滞が心配です\n歩道も広く特に混雑することもなく地下鉄の利便性も確保されているため\n人口が減少に向かう中であえて作る必要があるのか疑問です\n既存のバスや地下鉄の利便性を高めることが先決かと思います"],
    [187,187,"名東区",20,"女性",1,47,"",1,1,"",4,"",2,"",2,456,"",2,147,"温度・湿度が快適な車両",135,"",3,"　費用対効果は低いと思う"],
    [188,188,"緑区",50,"女性",1,4,"",1,1,"",4,"",6,"ドニチエコ切符・市バス地下鉄1日乗車券・マナカが使えるから。",3,26,"",2,345,"",135,"",1,"　ドイツ・フランス・オーストラリアへ行った時に似たような乗り物に乗りました。快適・便利で1日乗車券や数日間有効の乗車券を買ったので料金の心配も要らず、目的地への案内もわかりやすく滞在中はよく利用しました。観光に来た外国人には特に便利な乗り物になると思います。"],
    [189,189,"名東区",50,"男性",1,47,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",3,7,"",2,35,"",134,"",3,"　イメージが湧きにくい。次世代燃料のエコ運転なら、良いと思うが、あまり期待できない。地下鉄で十分ではないでしょうか？"],
    [190,190,"千種区",70,"男性",1,34,"",1,1,"",4,"",5,"",1,346,"",2,134,"",135,"",2,"　１　市のシンボルとしてまた市民の誇れるような観光誘致に役立つものにしてほしい。\n２　費用不足のため老化が目立ったり景観が悪くなったりしないように友の会やクラウドファンディングを利　　　　　\n　　用して恒久化をめざしてほしい。"],
    [191,191,"港区",30,"男性",1,45,"",1,1,"",1,"",5,"",3,458,"街並みが楽しくない",1,4,"",45,"",4,"99.0"],
    [192,192,"緑区",70,"男性",1,34,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",3,7,"",2,6,"",35,"",3,"99.0"],
    [193,193,"緑区",50,"男性",1,34,"",1,1,"",3,"",2,"",1,56,"",1,34,"",134,"",1,"　従来の基幹ﾊﾞｽ同様専用通行帯の使用に因り、定刻運行が見込まれ期待が高まるが、町中の違法駐車の排除も課題と考えられる"],
    [194,194,"天白区",70,"女性",1,34,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",1,126,"",2,1,"",35,"",1,"　すばらしい企画です。"],
    [195,195,"中川区",30,"男性",1,7,"",1,3,"",6,"",5,"",4,256,"",2,134,"",145,"",4,"99.0"],
    [196,196,"中区",20,"男性",1,12345,"",1,5,"",4,"",1,"",2,26,"",2,1,"",1345,"",3,"99.0"],
    [197,197,"中村区",50,"女性",1,234,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",4,16,"",2,6,"",13,"",4,"　さらに渋滞する"],
    [198,198,"千種区",60,"男性",1,34,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",1,156,"",2,134,"",37,"",2,"99.0"],
    [199,199,"緑区",30,"女性",1,7,"",1,1,"",2,"",6,"子供がいるので、荷物も多く車でないと大変なので。",3,6,"",2,35,"",347,"",3,"　このモニターアンケートで始めてＳＲＴについて知りました。\n地下鉄もあるのに、路上を走る意味合いがあるのか？とも思います。都心の交通量も多いので電車があるが故に渋滞が起こるのではと不安でもあります。"],
    [200,200,"中村区",70,"男性",1,24,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",2,126,"",2,134,"",135,"",2,"　市バスC-758を発展させたら---"],
    [201,201,"緑区",60,"女性",1,34,"",1,1,"",4,"",6,"敬老パスが利用出来るから",2,126,"",1,124,"",235,"",2,"99.0"],
    [202,202,"南区",30,"女性",1,457,"",1,5,"",4,"",1,"",2,6,"",2,135,"",345,"",1,"99.0"],
    [203,203,"千種区",60,"男性",1,14,"",1,5,"",1,"",6,"街並みを見ながら歩くのが楽しいから",1,23,"",2,125,"",134,"",1,"99.0"],
    [204,204,"西区",60,"男性",1,34,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",1,8,"自転車が危険",2,6,"",4,"",2,"99.0"],
    [205,205,"南区",70,"女性",1,34,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",1,246,"",2,134,"",134,"",2,"　どのような物かイメージしずらいが、あったら便利そうだし乗ってみたい。"],
    [206,206,"西区",20,"女性",1,345,"",1,5,"",4,"",5,"",2,16,"",2,12,"",25,"",2,"99.0"],
    [207,207,"中村区",50,"男性",1,4,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",1,6,"",2,13,"",145,"",2,"99.0"],
    [208,208,"名東区",30,"男性",1,4,"",1,4,"",4,"",4,"",4,256,"",2,135,"",356,"",1,"99.0"],
    [209,209,"守山区",50,"男性",1,37,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",2,15,"",2,147,"清潔",134,"",2,"　良いと思います。\n地下鉄やJR，名鉄との連携、そして何より初めてきた方がパッと見て分かるシンプルなシステムにして欲しいです。(迷わない。迷わせない。)\nあとこれを導入するにあたって、タクシーを何とかして下さい。車線一つ潰してるし、運転マナーが悪すぎます。(名駅～伏見～栄間)"],
    [210,210,"名東区",40,"女性",1,4,"",1,5,"",1,"",5,"",2,6,"",2,1235,"",3,"",1,"99.0"],
    [211,211,"名東区",60,"女性",1,14,"",1,4,"",4,"",1,"",2,5,"",2,234,"",24,"",2,"　他県から移住し、敬老パスに驚き、感謝でいっぱいです。市バスの料金の安さも驚きです。\n　高齢者は歩行が大切ですが、下肢痛で悩む人も大勢います。外出して年金を上手く使ってもらう為にもSRTの構想は賛成ですが、市バスとの兼ね合いや、経営（料金）はどうなるのか、自動車産業やタクシーの邪魔にならないか気になります。"],
    [212,212,"緑区",50,"女性",1,7,"",1,1,"",4,"",6,"エコキップが使えるから",2,45,"",2,135,"",17,"",2,"99.0"],
    [213,213,"名東区",60,"男性",1,3,"",1,1,"",3,"",3,"",2,56,"",2,135,"",145,"",1,"　都心部の渋滞には閉口します。公共交通機関が便利になるのは賛成です。進む高齢化で高齢者の運転も心配です。"],
    [214,214,"昭和区",50,"女性",1,34,"",1,1,"",3,"",2,"",1,156,"",2,13,"",135,"",2,"99.0"],
    [215,215,"中川区",30,"女性",1,3457,"",1,5,"",1,"",2,"",4,136,"",2,134,"",137,"",4,"　必要と思わない。\nタクシーもある、バスもある。\nこれ以上の便利さを求める必要がない。\n物を作るリスクを感じる。\n本当にわたしたちのことを考えて作るならばスポンサーからお金を集めて作って欲しい。\n使うか使わないかわからないものにお金を使うほど余裕がありますか？"],
    [216,216,"中川区",20,"男性",1,34,"",1,1,"",3,"",3,"",2,25,"",2,145,"",134,"",1,"99.0"],
    [217,217,"昭和区",50,"男性",1,4,"",1,4,"",4,"",1,"",3,7,"",2,5,"",1,"",1,"99.0"],
    [218,218,"名東区",70,"男性",1,34,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",2,1236,"",2,6,"",135,"",2,"　特にありません。"],
    [219,219,"東区",20,"男性",1,5,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",4,6,"",2,1,"",5,"",1,"　名駅と栄の移動手段としてSRTは魅力的な交通手段と考えます。是非具体的な検討を期待しています。"],
    [220,220,"名東区",30,"女性",1,4,"",1,1,"",1,"",2,"",2,7,"",1,15,"",134,"",4,"　新しくSRTを導入するよりも、休日の地下鉄やバスの本数を増やしてもらうほうが有難いです。"],
    [221,221,"中村区",60,"女性",1,34,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",2,26,"",2,134,"",135,"",3,"　今の私にとって、現在の公共交通機関に不便さを感じていないから、新たな必要性を感じない"],
    [222,222,"南区",60,"男性",1,345,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",1,238,"日陰や雨宿りがない",2,347,"レンタサイクル(電動アシスト)",147,"",1,"　是非、実現してほしい。都心から自家用車を締め出してほしい。"],
    [223,223,"千種区",40,"男性",1,4,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",3,5,"",2,457,"安い",1346,"",3,"　電車は手軽、安い、早い、本数が多い、を兼ね備えているが、それを踏まえて、新たな手段となる魅力が必要とかんじる。"],
    [224,224,"港区",50,"男性",1,7,"",1,1,"",6,"",5,"",4,125,"",1,134,"",457,"",1,"　後は運行時間だね\n無人走行で２４時間じゃないと意味無いよね"],
    [225,225,"北区",40,"男性",1,34,"",1,1,"",3,"",3,"",1,136,"",2,137,"ベビーカーや車椅子でも乗り降りしやすい車両",367,"",1,"　地下鉄では段差や上下移動が多く、子ども連れでは大変。SRTでは駅間距離を短くして短距離移動をしやすくしてほしい。\nパークアンドライド駐車場を増やして、中心部への車での流入を最小限にしてほしい。\nSRTの導入に期待しています。"],
    [226,226,"北区",50,"男性",1,47,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",3,68,"路上喫煙者が多い",2,134,"",134,"",1,"99.0"],
    [227,227,"港区",50,"男性",1,45,"",2,99,"",4,"",1,"",2,16,"",1,12,"",456,"",2,"99.0"],
    [228,228,"西区",70,"男性",1,34,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",2,156,"",1,14,"",14,"",1,"　ヨーロッパではトラムの名称で普及しておりバスより街づくりとしては良いと思う。"],
    [229,229,"緑区",60,"男性",1,47,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",2,246,"",2,134,"",145,"",3,"　主たる利用者がイメージできない。旅先でゆったり過ぎる時間を楽しむことは大変心地よいのだが、ここで暮らす生活者としては交通システムは目的ありきの移動手段であり、せっかちになりがちである。待ち時間を停車場などの空間で過ごすイメージがない。また利用者が少なければよいが密度が増せば快適さが低下するのではとい危惧もある。かつては選択の余地がないほど待ちがあり、時間はゆっくり流れていたが、この数十年でかなり時間に追われる日常になっている。空間を変えるだけで生活者の行動が変わるものだろうか。目指すイメージは理解するが、単に交通システムや空間構造の変革以外にも相当大きなライフスタイルや就労やレジャーなどのシステムの転換が必要な感じがする。あるいはSRTで目指すところの魅力が理解できていないのかもしれない。"],
    [230,230,"中村区",30,"男性",1,12,"",1,1,"",2,"",4,"",2,156,"",1,3,"",347,"",1,"　新しい技術の採用が主眼ではなく、将来に亘り変化に対応できるような導入の仕方を考えて欲しい。\n名古屋駅まで行くなら、駅のホームで乗り換えができるなど、本当の利便性を考えて欲しい。"],
    [231,231,"千種区",30,"男性",1,46,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",1,46,"",1,147,"子供が乗りやすい設計",145,"",1,"99.0"],
    [232,232,"中区",50,"男性",1,24,"",1,1,"",2,"",2,"",1,7,"",2,7,"無料で乗れる車両",5,"",3,"　SRTのモニターがあれば、やってみたい"],
    [233,233,"港区",60,"女性",1,34,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",2,236,"",2,6,"",567,"",5,"　特になし"],
    [234,234,"瑞穂区",60,"女性",1,37,"",1,1,"",6,"",5,"",5,5,"",2,235,"",13,"",2,"　車で主に移動しますが矢場町にある矢場とんの前を通りかかった時にたくさんのお客さんが並んでいるのを見かけました\nよく見ると手には地図やらガイドブックらしきものを手にしている人がちらほら\n\n観光客？こういうところに来るのねと思ったことがあります\nオアシス21の水の船も海外で人気とか\n\n観光客のみならず地元の人たちにも買い物巡りやらカフェめぐりやらに利用されるとしたらSRTはいいのではないかと思います\n\nただ自家用車の規制をされないといけないとなるとちょっと辛いかもしれません"],
    [235,235,"昭和区",60,"女性",1,34,"",1,1,"",3,"",3,"",2,246,"",2,123,"",134,"",2,"　やるからには中途半端なものでなく、車社会の名古屋で住民が思わず使いたくなる知恵を絞ったシステムのものにして下さい。"],
    [236,236,"昭和区",40,"女性",2,99,"",99,99,"",99,"",99,"",5,156,"",2,134,"",145,"",1,"　利用してみたいなと思いました。"],
    [237,237,"天白区",40,"女性",1,4,"",2,99,"",1,"",5,"",1,6,"",2,4,"",145,"",4,"　道路が混雑しそう。"],
    [238,238,"中村区",60,"女性",1,4,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",2,16,"",2,13,"",137,"",3,"99.0"],
    [239,239,"守山区",40,"男性",1,347,"",1,5,"",1,"",2,"",3,2,"",2,134,"",135,"",2,"99.0"],
    [240,240,"名東区",20,"女性",1,4,"",1,5,"",1,"",5,"",2,45,"",2,13,"",13467,"",1,"99.0"],
    [241,241,"名東区",40,"女性",1,7,"",1,4,"",6,"",6,"コロナ対策",4,16,"",2,134,"",134,"",5,"99.0"],
    [242,242,"中村区",70,"男性",1,34,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",1,256,"",2,123,"",134,"",3,"99.0"],
    [243,243,"昭和区",70,"男性",1,34,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",2,26,"",2,134,"",135,"",2,"99.0"],
    [244,244,"名東区",50,"女性",1,24,"",1,5,"",1,"",5,"",1,1268,"抽象的ですが『無機質』。中小の元気なお店、歩いて楽しいことが、足りない気がします。あと、歩く人をもっと優先すると活気も出る、都心に自家用車は要らないと思います。アスファルトが蓄熱してて暑い。",2,137,"車内の換気を良くする。",13457,"",1,"　エネルギーを持続可能なものにする（名古屋の町を暑苦しくしない）。バリアフリーを心がける。わかりやすさ（乗り換え、支払い方法）。安全性。作るとき使うとき、『得する人と損な人とが大きく別れないように』。"],
    [245,245,"守山区",30,"女性",1,37,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",2,136,"",2,15,"",135,"",1,"99.0"],
    [246,246,"瑞穂区",70,"男性",1,34,"",1,4,"",1,"",5,"",2,2,"",2,134,"",134,"",1,"　名古屋市内は道路が広いので渋滞が比較的少なく、街中での乗用車の使用に特に不便さが感じられませんでした。しかし、名古屋の都心への買い物等による人口集中および一層の高齢化社会を鑑みて、これまでのように自家用車に依存することは危険であると考えます。名古屋市民および名古屋を訪れる観光客が利用しやすいＳＲＴ構想が一刻も早く実現することを切望します。名古屋市内に市電が走っていた頃の古き良き時代を思い出します。"],
    [247,247,"西区",40,"男性",1,14,"",1,1,"",4,"",5,"",1,25,"",2,125,"",123,"",1,"　名古屋市がＳＲＴの導入を検討していると知ってワクワクして､今から楽しみなので、早く導入して欲しいです。"],
    [248,248,"中区",70,"男性",1,24,"",1,5,"",2,"",5,"",2,246,"",2,124,"",135,"",1,"　名古屋は、比較的こじんまりした街であり、しかも繁華街は限られている。ここを結ぶSRTは、利用者にとって大変便利であり、一方交通渋滞の解消にもなるので、とても価値があると思います。ただし、逆に繁華街が絞られてしまう恐れがあるので、もう一方の対策についても検討しておく必要があると思います。"],
    [249,249,"南区",70,"男性",1,34,"",1,1,"",1,"",5,"",2,26,"",1,235,"",145,"",2,"　車の二酸化炭素排出については十分ご検討をお願いします！"],
    [250,250,"昭和区",30,"男性",1,7,"",1,5,"",1,"",1,"",3,246,"",2,124,"",135,"",1,"　SRTを早期実現して、名古屋を盛り上げて欲しいです。"],
    [251,251,"緑区",60,"男性",1,34,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",2,26,"",2,1,"",134,"",2,"　名古屋は自動車の町だから、SRTを走らせるのは、困難を伴うと考えますが、混雑を緩和できれば良いと思います。"],
    [252,252,"南区",70,"男性",1,34,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",1,234,"",1,135,"",134,"",1,"99.0"],
    [253,253,"名東区",70,"男性",1,47,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",1,246,"",2,345,"",147,"",3,"99.0"],
    [254,254,"昭和区",40,"女性",1,34,"",1,2,"",4,"",2,"",3,126,"",2,123,"",134,"",2,"99.0"],
    [255,255,"緑区",50,"男性",1,45,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",3,6,"",2,15,"",134,"",2,"　料金は地下鉄と同程度以下に抑えてほしい。\n可能であれば市バスのように、一乗車ごとに固定料金であることが望ましい。"],
    [256,256,"天白区",70,"男性",1,4,"",1,5,"",1,"",5,"",2,16,"",2,123,"",345,"",2,"　名古屋観光ルートバスメーグルを参考にしてＳＲＴをお願いします。"],
    [257,257,"瑞穂区",50,"男性",1,24,"",1,1,"",3,"",2,"",3,26,"",1,13,"",1,"",1,"　早くリニアが開通してもらいたい"],
    [258,258,"港区",70,"男性",1,34,"",1,1,"",3,"",4,"",1,2,"",2,1,"",145,"",1,"　高齢なので、生きている間に早く実現できるとよい。"],
    [259,259,"西区",40,"女性",1,47,"",1,5,"",4,"",4,"",2,7,"",2,35,"",34,"",1,"99.0"],
    [260,260,"昭和区",20,"男性",1,45,"",2,99,"",99,"",99,"",3,256,"",1,134,"",345,"",2,"99.0"],
    [261,261,"緑区",70,"男性",1,34,"",2,99,"",1,"",5,"",3,246,"",1,6,"",149,"安全性と思いやりある運転",4,"　都心部のSRTよりも、地下鉄よりアクセスの良いバス本数の増強を優先してください。特に、区内循環バスの増強と増発を住民は切望。"],
    [262,262,"瑞穂区",20,"女性",1,34,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",2,5,"",2,135,"",135,"",1,"99.0"],
    [263,263,"天白区",20,"男性",1,24,"",2,99,"",99,"",99,"",5,156,"",2,135,"",3456,"",1,"99.0"],
    [264,264,"中川区",20,"男性",1,34,"",1,1,"",4,"",2,"",2,12,"",1,15,"",137,"",2,"99.0"],
    [265,265,"北区",70,"男性",1,34,"",2,99,"",4,"",1,"",4,6,"",2,1,"",14,"",1,"99.0"],
    [266,266,"名東区",70,"男性",1,34,"",1,5,"",4,"",5,"",1,3,"",1,1,"",345,"",1,"99.0"],
    [267,267,"西区",20,"男性",1,4,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",1,2,"",2,17,"都心部をつなぐとのことだったので、それらの地域の具体的な魅力を知れるような掲示があると面白いのではないかと感じました。",345,"",2,"99.0"],
    [268,268,"守山区",40,"男性",1,34,"",1,1,"",4,"",2,"",2,256,"",2,135,"",156,"",2,"99.0"],
    [269,269,"緑区",60,"男性",1,4,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",1,26,"",2,134,"",345,"",1,"　地上から地下鉄の改札までには階段だったり距離があったりで大変。人と環境に優しいSRTに期待しています。"],
    [270,270,"北区",60,"男性",1,24,"",2,99,"",99,"",99,"",5,16,"",2,124,"",135,"",1,"99.0"],
    [271,271,"中村区",40,"女性",1,14,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",5,56,"",2,13,"",14,"",1,"　地下鉄はどの駅もどんよりした雰囲気。乗り換えも階段が狭かったりで不便。ホームも狭いので待っていてストレスがある。\n新しい交通機関に魅力を感じる"],
    [272,272,"名東区",20,"女性",1,34,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",2,15,"",2,135,"",145,"",1,"99.0"],
    [273,273,"昭和区",20,"男性",1,4,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",2,145,"",2,135,"",245,"",2,"99.0"],
    [274,274,"熱田区",70,"男性",1,24,"",1,4,"",3,"",5,"",1,236,"",1,234,"",135,"",1,"99.0"],
    [275,275,"東区",20,"女性",1,4,"",1,5,"",1,"",1,"",4,5,"",2,1,"",134,"",1,"99.0"],
    [276,276,"東区",20,"女性",1,2456,"",1,1,"",4,"",5,"",3,126,"",2,125,"",135,"",1,"99.0"],
    [277,277,"千種区",30,"女性",2,99,"",1,1,"",3,"",1,"",2,1,"",2,1,"",125,"",1,"99.0"],
    [278,278,"中区",20,"男性",1,4,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",1,16,"",2,134,"",135,"",1,"99.0"],
    [279,279,"守山区",70,"女性",1,34,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",1,168,"標識や案内(ビルの名前や大きな店舗)",2,3,"",134,"",1,"99.0"],
    [280,280,"中川区",20,"男性",1,13457,"",1,1,"",4,"",6,"定期券と障がい者割引があるから",2,5,"",1,135,"",127,"",2,"　広告や商業イベントを多く受け入れUXも高い移動手段にしてほしい。"],
    [281,281,"守山区",70,"男性",1,34,"",1,5,"",4,"",2,"",2,7,"",1,1,"",135,"",3,"99.0"],
    [282,282,"東区",60,"女性",1,12,"",1,1,"",1,"",2,"",5,26,"",2,4,"",134,"",1,"　車輌は小さくても良いが、運行本数が多くて待ち時間がなく、利便性の良いものが望ましい。"],
    [283,283,"中区",60,"男性",1,47,"",2,99,"",99,"",99,"",4,4,"",2,4,"",3,"",4,"　特におもいあたらない"],
    [284,284,"中村区",60,"男性",1,14,"",1,5,"",1,"",1,"",1,236,"",2,234,"",135,"",1,"　初めてSRTという言葉を知りました。大賛成です。他の都市では、見覚えがなく知りませんので、名古屋の特徴を出せる企画であると思います。とやかく名古屋は宣伝がへたであると思っておりますので、車両等も個性的にして、大々的にPRすべきと考えます。又一時に終わらず、あの手この手の継続的な活動で、全国に周知を図るべきと考えます。それによりこのエリアの経済も活性化され、一石二鳥ですよね。うまくいけば、もっと他のエリアにも広がる可能性すら感じます。早い導入を期待しております。"],
    [285,285,"緑区",20,"女性",1,4,"",1,1,"",4,"",6,"定期があったから",5,156,"",2,145,"",135,"",2,"99.0"],
    [286,286,"南区",70,"男性",1,45,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",1,236,"",2,134,"",134,"",1,"　運転音が少なく、デザインが優れている物が良い。"],
    [287,287,"北区",20,"女性",1,4,"",1,5,"",1,"",1,"",3,1,"",2,34,"",234,"",3,"　SRTができることで道幅が狭くなり車が渋滞したり、歩行者の道が狭くならないか心配がある。"],
    [288,288,"熱田区",20,"女性",1,4,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",1,135,"",1,135,"",145,"",1,"99.0"],
    [289,289,"熱田区",60,"男性",1,4,"",1,4,"",4,"",5,"",1,236,"",1,134,"",137,"",1,"　インフラを充実して車両10万台投入し交通システム運営管理にあたると名古屋の未来がより良いものになると思います。"],
    [290,290,"昭和区",70,"女性",1,24,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",2,25,"",2,13,"",145,"",2,"　停車場所、待ち時間の埋め合わせが出来るものが有ると良い"],
    [291,291,"緑区",50,"女性",1,4,"",2,99,"",4,"",6,"到着時間が正確だから。",2,12,"",2,134,"",146,"",1,"　ＳＲＴが実現されれば、観光面での大きなメリットにつながるのではないかと思います。"],
    [292,292,"緑区",70,"男性",1,4,"",1,5,"",4,"",1,"",1,236,"",1,137,"地下鉄の様な点間（駅間）の移動では得られない線状の移動で、ルート上の景観・ショッピングを楽しみたい。",156,"",1,"　名古屋市内に市電が走っていた頃、都心・副都心と呼ばれた特定のエリアもあったが、それ以上に路面電車の沿線は、生活に密着した地域ごとの住宅地域・商業地域・商工業地域などを結ぶ市民の生活密着型の交通手段であったと思う。SRTも都心の特定エリアを繋ぐだけではなく『市民の足』としての構想も必要と思います。"],
    [293,293,"中川区",50,"男性",1,37,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",2,128,"人が多すぎる。",2,123,"",135,"",1,"　SRTが乗れる場所や区間。車が多い街なので渋滞につながらないか心配。"],
    [294,294,"緑区",20,"女性",1,47,"",1,1,"",4,"",2,"",3,35,"",2,34,"",134,"",3,"　周知を徹底しないといけないし、地下鉄や市バスとの差別化をどうつけるかのアピールが大事そう"],
    [295,295,"千種区",60,"女性",1,47,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",5,6,"",2,134,"",134,"",5,"　具体的なイメージがつかめないので、何とも言えない。"],
    [296,296,"千種区",70,"男性",1,34,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",5,26,"",2,13,"",135,"",2,"　srtについての、今後の情報発信に期待します。\n（進行状況など、広報等にて）"],
    [297,297,"千種区",40,"女性",1,24,"",1,2,"",4,"",1,"",2,26,"",2,145,"",134,"",2,"　このような素晴らしいシステムを構想中とは知りませんでした。車に乗らないので、名古屋を案内する時はもっぱら地下鉄・メーグル・C758のバスを利用していました。このように美しく便利な街並みになると他府県からきた親戚・友達にも自慢できます。このように整備されましたら、車いすの母もぜひ呼んでみたいと思いました。"],
    [298,298,"中区",40,"女性",1,12,"",1,3,"",4,"",1,"",1,458,"路上駐輪の自転車が多すぎる",2,124,"",134,"",1,"　以前上海に住んでいたときに似たような交通システムがありました。地下鉄のように上下に移動することもなくフラットにさっと乗れて便利でした。早く運用が始まることを期待します。"],
    [299,299,"緑区",40,"男性",1,24,"",1,4,"",4,"",2,"",1,5,"",2,4,"",1,"",2,"　自動車制限と一緒でなければ、利用者が少なく、コスト高になると思う。"],
    [300,300,"港区",40,"男性",1,7,"",2,99,"",99,"",99,"",4,156,"",2,6,"",137,"",5,"99.0"],
    [301,301,"天白区",70,"女性",1,47,"",1,1,"",6,"",6,"家族と一緒のときは選択の余地がないため（介護）",4,6,"",1,1,"",134,"",1,"　富山駅前から同じような路面交通を利用したが静かで街に馴染み、よかった。６、７の回答と関連するが、家族に障害があり、介護者運転の自家用車でしか移動不可能なため都心での使用制限は困る。SRTに反対ではないが考慮してほしい。"],
    [302,302,"中川区",20,"女性",1,457,"",1,1,"",4,"",5,"",2,7,"",2,15,"",345,"",3,"　ＳＲＴとバスにあまり違いが感じられなかった。バス停やバス専用レーンをさらに整備するだけでも良いと思った。"],
    [303,303,"昭和区",30,"女性",1,14,"",1,1,"",4,"",5,"",1,236,"",2,145,"",125,"",1,"99.0"],
    [304,304,"千種区",50,"女性",1,47,"",2,99,"",99,"",99,"",1,2,"",2,135,"",137,"",2,"99.0"],
    [305,305,"瑞穂区",60,"男性",1,34,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",1,26,"",2,14,"",145,"",2,"　期待したいが、現行のような車両走行状況での併用は難しいのでは？\n区域内における自家用車の利用制限等も勘案しながら、利用者にとってのメリット（利便性、運賃等）を大きくして欲しい。"],
    [306,306,"南区",20,"女性",1,2345,"",1,5,"",4,"",2,"",2,156,"",2,25,"",345,"",2,"99.0"],
    [307,307,"緑区",20,"女性",1,4,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",2,256,"",2,135,"",134,"",1,"　地下鉄やバス同様に定期券を使えると嬉しい。\nまた、既存の交通手段との乗り換えが便利だとよいと思う。"],
    [308,308,"西区",70,"男性",1,34,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",2,47,"",1,24,"",15,"",2,"99.0"],
    [309,309,"東区",60,"女性",1,7,"",1,1,"",6,"",1,"",4,26,"",2,14,"",45,"",1,"　自動車の走行も引き続き不便がないような交通手段としてのSTRを検討して下さい。"],
    [310,310,"昭和区",40,"男性",1,234,"",1,1,"",4,"",2,"",1,138,"道路そのものが車優先と感じる",2,134,"",567,"",1,"　今回初めて知ったが、国内においては先進的な試み？で、ワクワクする企画であり、ぜひ実現して欲しい。ただ、回遊性というと、観光向けという感じがするが、市民にも利用してもらうには、地下鉄やバスとの連携も必要。また、車線を潰すことも踏まえ、車の利便性を下げるのではなく、車でくる必要がないと感じさせる工夫であったり、ライドアンドパークの仕組みなどを考えて欲しい。"],
    [311,311,"中村区",10,"男性",1,47,"",1,5,"",1,"",2,"",3,5,"",2,1,"",14,"",2,"99.0"],
    [312,312,"西区",20,"女性",1,1346,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",2,5,"",2,2,"",4,"",2,"　なし"],
    [313,313,"千種区",70,"男性",1,34,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",1,246,"",1,134,"",135,"",2,"　運行エリアがどうしても繁華街・観光地中心になるため、利用度の少ない市民に如何に理解を得るかが課題になると思います。他地域から訪れる人に可愛がってもらえる、話題にしてもらえるSRTの実現を目指して欲しいと思います。"],
    [314,314,"昭和区",40,"男性",1,24,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",2,6,"",2,7,"高頻度かつ低料金または定額料金",147,"",3,"　まずは自転車道をしっかり整備して、自転車移動をメインにしていく方針にするほうがよいのでは。\nSRTを普及させるには１乗車100円以内、待ち時間7分以内の高頻度運行が必要と思われます。\nかなり赤字に耐えられる覚悟が必要と思われます。"],
    [315,315,"名東区",50,"女性",1,47,"",1,1,"",4,"",2,"",2,8,"人気がない通りをあるくとき、不審者に出会いそうで怖いと思う。",2,1,"",346,"",1,"99.0"],
    [316,316,"千種区",20,"男性",1,124,"",1,3,"",4,"",5,"",5,5,"",2,6,"",1,"",3,"99.0"],
    [317,317,"緑区",30,"男性",1,1234567,"",2,99,"",1,"",1,"",2,126,"",2,134,"",167,"",3,"99.0"],
    [318,318,"西区",30,"女性",1,27,"",1,1,"",2,"",2,"",3,12,"",2,124,"",137,"",2,"99.0"],
    [319,319,"名東区",60,"女性",1,4,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",1,12346,"",2,145,"",346,"",1,"99.0"],
    [320,320,"熱田区",50,"女性",1,34,"",1,5,"",1,"",1,"",5,7,"",2,1,"",134,"",3,"　SRTの導入によって市バスの本数が減るとか路線が変更になるなどがあると困るのでそういうことがないように考えていただきたいです。車を使う人が極端に減るとは思えないので渋滞も増えるような気がします。\n地下鉄のように階段の登り降りがなく乗れるのは良いと思います。名駅と栄はバスがわかりにくいのでそこはうれしいです。"],
    [321,321,"瑞穂区",50,"男性",1,4,"",1,6,"新瑞橋⇔栄エリア",4,"",1,"",5,56,"",2,12,"",135,"",3,"99.0"],
    [322,322,"熱田区",30,"女性",1,47,"",1,1,"",1,"",2,"",5,7,"",2,5,"",145,"",2,"99.0"],
    [323,323,"瑞穂区",30,"男性",1,34,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",1,4,"",1,2,"",145,"",1,"99.0"],
    [324,324,"東区",30,"男性",1,47,"",2,99,"",6,"",5,"",3,6,"",2,457,"目新しいもので維持費がかからないもの",123,"",2,"　黒字経営をお願いします。"],
    [325,325,"東区",20,"女性",1,24,"",1,1,"",2,"",1,"",3,7,"",1,4,"",145,"",1,"99.0"],
    [326,326,"港区",50,"女性",1,4,"",1,4,"",4,"",1,"",2,156,"",2,345,"",345,"",5,"99.0"],
    [327,327,"天白区",20,"女性",1,4,"",1,1,"",4,"",2,"",2,12,"",2,3,"",135,"",4,"　市営地下鉄の一日乗車券が対応していると利用しやすいです。"],
    [328,328,"瑞穂区",70,"女性",1,34,"",1,5,"",1,"",2,"",3,7,"",2,2,"",14,"",3,"99.0"],
    [329,329,"天白区",50,"男性",1,47,"",2,99,"",4,"",1,"",2,56,"",2,34,"",134,"",2,"　名古屋から脱炭素やエコの取組を世界に発信して欲しい"],
    [330,330,"南区",40,"女性",1,45,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",2,16,"",2,135,"",345,"",2,"　開放的で明るい健全な雰囲気のアピールをして、犯罪等が起きにくい雰囲気づくりをお願いしたいです。"],
    [331,331,"天白区",30,"男性",1,49,"シェアサイクル(カリテコバイク・チャリチャリ)",1,1,"",8,"シェアサイクル(カリテコバイク・チャリチャリ)",5,"",1,468,"車の運転マナーが悪い",1,124,"",127,"",1,"　コスト面を考えるとバスをベースとしたBRTが選択肢として有力視されているが、観光的な意味や注目を集める意味、今後の拡張性やエコという視点を考えた場合はLRTで構築したほうが長期視点では名古屋の発展に寄与すると考えます。"],
    [332,332,"中区",30,"男性",1,1,"",1,1,"",1,"",6,"自宅から徒歩圏内",2,134,"",1,14,"",1345,"",3,"　専用レーンを整備して渋滞に引っかかることなく、電車やバスと違い、さっと気軽に乗れるものであって欲しい"],
    [333,333,"中村区",40,"男性",1,34,"",1,1,"",4,"",4,"",5,456,"",2,234,"",135,"",1,"　朝のラッシュ時における地下鉄東山線名古屋駅と栄駅の混雑解消に寄与できるものであり、都心の交通渋滞解消になりうるものなら賛成である。\n\n現状、路面公共交通システムは交通渋滞の時間帯や地区があるので成果はあげにくいのではないかと思われる。また、以上の設問から推測するに現在の市バスのイメージがあり、市バスとの相当な差別化が必要かと思われる。市バスのシステムを活用し、市バスを内包していくことになると思う。道路整備も必要となるので、交通渋滞が避けられないはずであるが。\n市バスの特定の路線だけを新システムに切り替えにした方がスムーズにいくのではないか。\n名古屋駅、大須間にダイレクトに行けたら楽になるので実現してもらいたい。"],
    [334,334,"北区",60,"女性",1,34,"",1,5,"",4,"",1,"",1,26,"",2,5,"",5,"",4,"　路面公共交通システムという日本語があるのに、なぜわざわざわからない「SRT」という言葉を使うのかが全然わかりません。またフルスペルは、Smart Roadway Transitだと思いますが、これからどういう理屈で「新たな路面公共交通システム」という訳語がでているのかも分かりません。"],
    [335,335,"緑区",60,"女性",1,4,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",2,6,"",2,123,"",134,"",5,"99.0"],
    [336,336,"緑区",70,"女性",1,34,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",2,246,"",2,13,"",345,"",2,"99.0"],
    [337,337,"東区",30,"男性",1,45,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",1,25,"",2,134,"",357,"",1,"99.0"],
    [338,338,"熱田区",60,"女性",1,45,"",1,5,"",4,"",1,"",3,26,"",2,13,"",136,"",2,"　自家用車や自転車と共存できるシステムにしてほしい。"],
    [339,339,"名東区",70,"男性",1,23,"",1,1,"",2,"",5,"",2,146,"",2,6,"",8,"",4,"99.0"],
    [340,340,"中川区",60,"女性",1,23,"",1,1,"",2,"",2,"",1,123,"",2,3,"",135,"",1,"　路面電車のような便利でエコそしてスマートな乗り物が運行されると嬉しいです。"],
    [341,341,"瑞穂区",40,"女性",1,4,"",1,1,"",1,"",5,"",2,2,"",2,35,"",145,"",2,"99.0"],
    [342,342,"港区",50,"男性",1,45,"",2,99,"",99,"",99,"",1,126,"",2,145,"",126,"",1,"99.0"],
    [343,343,"東区",10,"男性",1,24,"",1,1,"",2,"",2,"",3,2,"",2,13,"",467,"",2,"99.0"],
    [344,344,"千種区",70,"男性",1,34,"",1,4,"",4,"",1,"",2,2,"",2,15,"",135,"",2,"　早く実施できると良い。"],
    [345,345,"緑区",20,"男性",1,4,"",1,1,"",4,"",5,"",2,7,"",2,3,"",14,"",1,"99.0"],
    [346,346,"北区",40,"女性",1,7,"",1,5,"",6,"",6,"子ども連れでも安心だから",4,168,"車の交通量が多く、路駐や割り込みなど車の交通マナーも悪いので、ベビーカーを押し、上の子たちを連れてでは安心して通行できない。人出も多いので、3人の子連れの身としては都心を歩くハードルはかなり高く、滅多に行きません。",2,134,"",134,"",5,"　公共交通機関より自家用車を選んでしまうのは、子連れにとって公共交通機関が利用しにくいためです。地下鉄や電車は、駅に着いてからホームまでがかなり距離があり、階段上り下りもあり大変です。バス停のように、駅に着いたらすぐ乗り物に乗れるような手軽さがあれば利用しようという気持ちになるかもしれません。また、乗り物内で子どもが多少騒いでも許容されるような環境であれば、是非利用したいと考えます。バス内で子どもが騒ぐと周りの方々に嫌がられるので、気を遣わねばならず、結果利用を避けることになります。また、待ち時間が長いと利用しにくいです(子どもは長時間待てません)。また、待合室にトイレがあると良いです。"],
    [347,347,"名東区",30,"男性",1,34,"",1,1,"",1,"",2,"",5,7,"",2,134,"",147,"",2,"99.0"],
    [348,348,"北区",30,"男性",1,45,"",1,3,"",3,"",6,"乗り換えがないから。",2,256,"",2,17,"段差がなくて乗り降りしやすい車両",145,"",1,"　定時性を保って欲しい。"],
    [349,349,"緑区",20,"女性",1,45,"",1,1,"",4,"",2,"",1,6,"",2,14,"",345,"",2,"99.0"],
    [350,350,"港区",60,"男性",1,34,"",1,5,"",4,"",1,"",2,456,"",2,345,"",145,"",2,"99.0"],
    [351,351,"天白区",70,"男性",1,4,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",1,236,"",2,234,"",134,"",3,"　繁華街での商業施設搬入車　通過車両など運行基準を決められるか？まだまだ話し合いによる会議が足らないような感じがします。"],
    [352,352,"名東区",70,"男性",1,47,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",2,2,"",2,1,"",6,"",1,"99.0"],
    [353,353,"東区",60,"女性",1,47,"",1,5,"",4,"",1,"",2,68,"道幅が広くても往来が混然としていて、かつスマホを操作しながら歩く方が多いので、気をつけて歩かないと正面衝突しかねない状況が度々あることに不満を感じます。",2,137,"5分間隔くらいで乗りたい時にすぐに乗れるようになると良いと思います。市バスのように道路の混雑状況によって遅れると暑い中や寒い中待つことになるため、次々と走行するイメージだと乗りたいと思います。",139,"車椅子が待機できる空間がある",1,"　お年寄りや車椅子の方が気兼ねすることなくスムーズに利用できるような交通機関になることを望みます。"],
    [354,354,"熱田区",50,"男性",1,124,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",2,156,"",1,6,"",1367,"",4,"　クルマ社会の名古屋で行うには難題山盛りだと思う。しかし、これから迎える長高齢化社会において老人が気楽に利用出来て買い物に行ける手段を考えないと明るい未来は無いね。"],
    [355,355,"緑区",40,"女性",1,47,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",3,6,"",2,345,"",134,"",2,"99.0"],
    [356,356,"中村区",60,"女性",1,4,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",2,26,"",1,34,"",14,"",3,"99.0"],
    [357,357,"北区",50,"男性",1,478,"",1,4,"",6,"",5,"",3,256,"",2,45,"",157,"",3,"99.0"],
    [358,358,"名東区",70,"男性",1,47,"",1,5,"",4,"",2,"",2,168,"路上駐車があり幼児や高齢者や障害者の障害になる。",1,137,"都心での買い物の荷物の移動があり、歩行者に考慮したシステムを導入して欲しい。",134,"",2,"　子供や高齢者、障害者等、弱者にやさしい交通にして欲しい。"],
    [359,359,"中川区",60,"女性",1,45,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",1,6,"",2,4,"",14,"",1,"　名古屋人はせっかちなイメージがあるので、少しくらい時間とおりに走らなくても、安心安全第一を希望します。\n楽しみにしています。"],
    [360,360,"北区",40,"女性",1,37,"",1,5,"",1,"",5,"",4,6,"",1,134,"",134,"",4,"99.0"],
    [361,361,"港区",70,"男性",1,34,"",1,5,"",1,"",5,"",1,256,"",2,234,"",345,"",1,"　Q10にもありますが、目立つ、かつエコな車両でマスコミが取材に来て全国の人が「名古屋へ行ってみようか、乗ってみようか」といわれるようにしてください。"],
    [362,362,"中川区",30,"女性",1,5,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",2,26,"",2,134,"",135,"",2,"99.0"],
    [363,363,"瑞穂区",20,"女性",1,47,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",2,136,"",2,124,"",349,"子供が楽しんで待てるような空間があると嬉しい",1,"　海外のように、ベビーカーや大きな荷物を持ってでも遠慮せずに乗れると嬉しい。\n\n車両はよくある近未来的なデザインではなく、街の雰囲気などと調和したものにしてほしい。名古屋だから、金色などと言った下品なデザインにしないでほしい。"],
    [364,364,"緑区",50,"女性",1,47,"",1,3,"",4,"",2,"",2,26,"",2,23,"",36,"",2,"　主な交通手段になるかどうかは運賃にもよると思う"],
    [365,365,"西区",40,"女性",1,347,"",1,1,"",4,"",2,"",4,238,"ドラッグストアばかりで面白いお店が少なくなった",2,7,"無料の車両、頻繁に来る車両、清潔な車両",134,"",5,"　名古屋のバスはちっとも来ない\n早い時間、遅い時間は更に本数が少なくなる\nそれがイメージです\n路線もバス停も解りにくい\n\n地下鉄駅が沢山ある方が皆さん使いやすいと思います\nとは言え、費用や工事の問題もあるのでしょうか\n\nSRTが不便とか認知されない等により、結果的に廃止になるようなものでは無く、継続的に運用していただけるものになることを期待します"],
    [366,366,"中村区",50,"女性",1,4,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",1,23,"",1,134,"",45,"",1,"99.0"],
    [367,367,"瑞穂区",40,"女性",2,99,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",2,6,"",2,6,"",1,"",2,"99.0"],
    [368,368,"名東区",40,"男性",1,14,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",3,124,"",2,1,"",146,"",1,"99.0"],
    [369,369,"千種区",40,"女性",1,47,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",1,245,"",2,134,"",356,"",1,"　高齢者や子育て世代（乳幼児連れ）に優しい（乗車割引など）があると嬉しいです。\nSRTが導入されたら、その場所は自家用車の入場制限をしてほしいです。歩く時に危険を感じるので。"],
    [370,370,"名東区",50,"男性",1,1346,"",1,5,"",3,"",4,"",1,8,"歩車分離ばかりで今はそれが仇になっているから嫌だ",1,4,"",13,"",1,"　自家用車の制限をしないと絵空事で終わってしまいます\n名古屋は東西の大きい道が栄地区から名古屋駅に４本あるので\n欲張らなければ可能ではないかと思います\nただ南北の道に関しては少ないので要検証だと思います"],
    [371,371,"千種区",60,"女性",1,24,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",5,7,"",2,234,"",347,"",5,"　地下鉄と違い乗るのに階段がないので、体の不自由な人でも気軽に乗れる人に優しい乗物になって欲しい。"],
    [372,372,"北区",60,"女性",1,3457,"",1,1,"",1,"",1,"",4,26,"",2,2,"",4,"",3,"99.0"],
    [373,373,"昭和区",70,"女性",1,34,"",1,1,"",3,"",3,"",1,268,"公衆トイレがあると良いです。",2,345,"",135,"",1,"　憩いのある待合室｡\n外に出たくなる様な乗り物。\n高齢者や障がい者、幼な子を連れた人なども楽に乗り降りできる乗り物を期待しています。"],
    [374,374,"北区",50,"女性",1,27,"",1,4,"",2,"",5,"",2,6,"",2,47,"高齢者、障がい者に優しい車両",13,"",1,"　本数を多くすることが大事"],
    [375,375,"昭和区",70,"男性",1,34,"",2,99,"",99,"",99,"",1,7,"",2,13,"",145,"",2,"　マイカーを削減しよう。"],
    [376,376,"守山区",70,"女性",1,5,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",5,26,"",2,3,"",14,"",3,"99.0"],
    [377,377,"天白区",40,"男性",1,47,"",1,4,"",4,"",2,"",2,1,"",1,47,"安全安心",8,"",3,"　家庭や事業所おいて配送や宅配が当たり前の都会の街中で、車の制限をしてまでバスや地下鉄に代わる交通は、流通の妨げになりかねない。\n目新しさや環境には良いが、道路整備が必要となり現実的ではない。\nバスのほうが効率的。"],
    [378,378,"南区",60,"女性",1,4,"",1,5,"",4,"",1,"",2,36,"",2,15,"",467,"",3,"99.0"],
    [379,379,"瑞穂区",40,"女性",1,47,"",2,99,"",4,"",1,"",1,236,"",2,17,"皆んな座れる",1234567,"",4,"　必要性を感じない。\n名古屋都心は地下鉄、JR、名鉄で十分。\n無駄に税金を使うなら、未来の子どもたちのために教育や、家庭環境に使ってください。"],
    [380,380,"北区",50,"男性",1,27,"",1,5,"",1,"",1,"",1,268,"段差が多い。",1,134,"",147,"",1,"　とてもいい考えだと思います。\nとくに、名古屋は栄、大須、名駅、伏見と近い場所に繁華街やオフィス街があるので、こういった交通機関が合う街だと思います。SRT導入に伴い、道路を歩行者、自転車、新モビリティ、車と区画を分けて共存できると良いと考えます"],
    [381,381,"瑞穂区",50,"女性",1,37,"",2,99,"",99,"",99,"",4,7,"",2,135,"",145,"",3,"　SRTのことは今回のアンケートで初めて知ったが、とてもいいアイデアだと思う。ただ\n回遊しない自分にとっては、自宅から都心への公共交通機関の不便さ(本数の少なさ、料金の高さ)から、自家用車利用が減るとは思えない。都心だけで考えるのではなく、周辺住宅地から都心への移動も含めて考えるべきでは？"],
    [382,382,"中川区",50,"女性",1,45,"",1,1,"",4,"",5,"",1,26,"",2,12,"",134,"",1,"　名古屋は地下鉄があり便利ではあるが短い区間でもいちいち地下深く潜らなければいけないのが面倒\n一駅なら歩いたほうが早い方と思うが暑さ、寒さなどがあると乗り物に乗って早く目的地に着きたいと思うから利用する\n\n長崎で路面電車に乗ったが地上を走っているのでさっと乗り降りできてべんりだとおもった\n名古屋も昔は路面電車ありましたよね\n80代の母も地下鉄は階段が嫌だからなるべくバスに乗るようにしていると言っていました"],
    [383,383,"守山区",40,"女性",1,35,"",2,99,"",4,"",1,"",2,4,"",2,37,"低価格",3,"",5,"　路面という事なので、もらい事故含め、事故が起きなければ良いと思う。\n\n敬老パスが使用できるとするなら、一日乗車券も使用可能にして欲しい。"],
    [384,384,"緑区",30,"女性",1,45,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",2,24,"",2,135,"",134,"",2,"　名古屋をよりよい街にしてくれると期待しています。\n\nベビーカーや車椅子が過ごしやすいといいです。"],
    [385,385,"熱田区",70,"男性",1,45,"",1,1,"",3,"",4,"",2,235,"",1,135,"",34,"",2,"99.0"],
    [386,386,"熱田区",70,"男性",1,4,"",1,5,"",4,"",1,"",2,26,"",2,23,"",135,"",2,"　ありません"],
    [387,387,"中村区",70,"男性",1,34,"",1,1,"",3,"",5,"",2,12,"",2,234,"",13,"",2,"　手軽に使える移動手段で\nエコな車両\n誰もが利用しやすい車で\nあってほしく思っています"],
    [388,388,"緑区",70,"女性",1,45,"",1,6,"資格試験受験のため名駅近くに",1,"",1,"",2,126,"",2,345,"",134,"",2,"　難しいかも分かりませんが障害者、高齢者、名古屋への来訪者等に分かりやすくて安全に利用出来れば是非SRTを利用して出掛けてみたいです。"],
    [389,389,"中村区",20,"女性",1,34,"",1,1,"",3,"",1,"",2,256,"",2,125,"",146,"",1,"99.0"],
    [390,390,"瑞穂区",60,"女性",1,37,"",2,99,"",6,"",5,"",2,6,"",2,134,"",156,"",2,"99.0"],
    [391,391,"北区",50,"女性",1,3,"",1,4,"",3,"",2,"",2,126,"",2,134,"",135,"",3,"　実現化したら乗ってみたいとは思います。"],
    [392,392,"中川区",60,"女性",1,34,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",2,4,"",2,13,"",345,"",2,"　自動運転には、まだ恐怖感があるので安全性を重視して欲しいです。"],
    [393,393,"中村区",70,"男性",1,4,"",1,1,"",4,"",4,"",1,126,"",1,134,"",356,"",2,"　現在の名古屋駅から栄えまでのルートは狭いので、簡単に反対、反対と、言わないで道路拡張案を真剣に検討する時期だと思います。名古屋人は閉鎖的な人が多いので万人受けする検討では、100年先でも、実現しないですよ。"],
    [394,394,"南区",70,"女性",1,57,"",1,1,"",5,"",3,"",2,26,"",2,123,"",345,"",1,"　☆段差がない場所で乗り降り。\n☆乗り降りをするのにあまり歩かなくて良い場所が停留所\n☆車内の風通しが良い\n\n等、簡単なことですけど足腰の弱い私にとっては重要なことです"],
    [395,395,"名東区",40,"男性",1,347,"",1,1,"",3,"",3,"",3,346,"",2,135,"",135,"",2,"　街が便利になってほしい。"],
    [396,396,"港区",40,"女性",1,5,"",2,99,"",99,"",99,"",2,256,"",2,137,"安心安全な車両",146,"",3,"　地下鉄と何が違いますか？\n利用料金は？"],
    [397,397,"熱田区",60,"男性",1,24,"",1,5,"",1,"",5,"",1,256,"",1,135,"",156,"",1,"　是非環境都市と全国に誇れるシステムにしてください。"],
    [398,398,"東区",50,"男性",1,34,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",3,2,"",2,135,"",135,"",3,"　地下鉄と市バスがあれば十分なのでは？"],
    [399,399,"昭和区",30,"女性",1,27,"",1,1,"",3,"",2,"",3,246,"",2,134,"",145,"",2,"99.0"],
    [400,400,"千種区",50,"女性",1,37,"",1,5,"",1,"",2,"",5,126,"",2,234,"",136,"",2,"　回数券、一日乗車券、学割等の割引があると利用したくなります。\n\n待合空間に観光案内やマルシェ、写真撮影スポットなど待ち時間も楽しめるスポットが欲しいです、"],
    [401,401,"中川区",50,"男性",1,67,"",1,2,"",6,"",1,"",2,256,"",2,1,"",1,"",2,"99.0"],
    [402,402,"天白区",50,"男性",1,47,"",1,1,"",4,"",2,"",4,126,"",2,345,"",157,"",1,"99.0"],
    [403,403,"昭和区",50,"女性",1,47,"",1,5,"",1,"",1,"",1,12,"",2,345,"",167,"",1,"99.0"],
    [404,404,"緑区",40,"男性",1,57,"",1,1,"",4,"",4,"",3,7,"",2,3,"",156,"",2,"99.0"],
    [405,405,"守山区",60,"女性",1,7,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",2,246,"",2,135,"",134,"",2,"99.0"],
    [406,406,"東区",70,"女性",1,34,"",1,1,"",4,"",5,"",1,246,"",1,13,"",134,"",4,"99.0"],
    [407,407,"緑区",70,"男性",1,45,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",1,348,"夏は路面の照り返しで暑い　車の排気ガス等で空気が汚れていてすがすがしくない",2,134,"",135,"",3,"99.0"],
    [408,408,"北区",30,"男性",1,24,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",1,245,"",1,7,"それなりに高頻度で運転されるか、又はバスよりも定時制の確保できる乗り物",147,"",3,"　バス、地下鉄とどう棲み分けるのか見えていない。\n基幹バス、ゆとりーとライン、通常の鉄道(市電等)との違いはなんでしょうか？\nわざわざそれらと違うシステムを導入する理由は？(目的を叶えられるなら、同じものを導入した方が運用コストは格段に下がります。)"],
    [409,409,"熱田区",60,"男性",1,45,"",1,5,"",1,"",4,"",2,246,"",2,134,"",157,"",2,"　今回の案では、都心間の定義で（名古屋駅、栄、大須、名古屋城）とありますが、名古屋城を入れていると言うことは観光面も入れているように思います。それならば熱田神宮も入るのではないかと思います。もし可能ならば、名古屋城、栄、大須　は南北の大津通でつながっています。そしてその先は熱田神宮にまでつながっています。ですからこの案を少し延伸して（熱田神宮）までにしてはと思いました。\nもしコスト面で難があるのであれば、大津通の路線を先行してもよいと思います。名古屋駅からは　栄、金山、熱田神宮、に直接路線が接続していますので後回しでもよいように思います。"],
    [410,410,"東区",60,"女性",1,47,"",1,5,"",6,"",5,"",2,126,"",2,13,"",145,"",2,"　一日中乗り放題で、本数も多くしてほしい。待ち時間を快適にお過ごしたい。冷暖房など。"],
    [411,411,"中区",70,"男性",1,12,"",1,4,"",1,"",1,"",4,7,"",1,4,"",45,"",3,"99.0"],
    [412,412,"南区",30,"男性",1,145,"",1,5,"",1,"",2,"",1,12,"",2,14,"",147,"",1,"99.0"],
    [413,413,"中川区",50,"女性",1,4,"",2,99,"",99,"",99,"",3,26,"",2,57,"車両と乗り場との段差のない車両（足が悪いため、一旦車道に降りてバスに乗るのは困難）",347,"",2,"99.0"],
    [414,414,"西区",30,"女性",1,24,"",1,4,"",2,"",3,"",5,156,"",1,157,"車椅子の方が1人で乗り降りできるレベルのユニバーサルデザインが取り入れられている車両",134,"",5,"　Q9のリンク先のSRT構想PDFにあるような待合空間(大きな屋根や風よけがあったり座る場所が広くとってある待合空間)はSRTじゃなくて今すぐ作っていただきたいです。\n職場の近く(港区)の市バスのバス停は日陰も椅子もありません。毎朝お年寄りの方が病院へ行くためにを待っていらっしゃいますがこの季節は特に暑さが厳しくしんどそうです。病院へ毎朝通うくらい体が悪く、既にしんどいのにバスを待つ間カンカンに太陽に熱せられて倒れてしまわないか見かける度に心配になります。せめて屋根だけでもどこのバス停にもつきませんか？"],
    [415,415,"緑区",30,"女性",1,7,"",1,5,"",1,"",1,"",3,56,"",2,134,"",345,"",2,"99.0"],
    [416,416,"北区",70,"男性",1,34,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",1,16,"",2,34,"",17,"",2,"　エコな車両を希望する"],
    [417,417,"天白区",60,"男性",1,4,"",1,4,"",4,"",1,"",1,245,"",1,135,"",345,"",1,"　富山はじめ全国でＳＲＴは採用されていますが、新規に路線を敷設するのは経費も時間もかかるので大変です。市内全域を走っていた市電が全廃されたのが残念です。トヨタのお膝元だったからか車社会に転換してしまったのが悔やまれます。我々の世代は市電に乗って高校など通うのが夢でした。ただ、地下鉄網とバス路線の整備で名古屋の市内の移動は比較的スムーズにできます。市バスを利用していますがバス停も整備され時間も正確です。都心の移動も大切ですが市内全域特に周辺部のバス路線の整備をして車に依存しない都市を目指していただくことを希望します。主旨と外れた意見で申し訳ありません。"],
    [418,418,"守山区",30,"男性",1,57,"",1,4,"",4,"",1,"",3,6,"",2,34,"",46,"",2,"99.0"],
    [419,419,"西区",40,"女性",1,27,"",1,5,"",2,"",2,"",4,1,"",2,6,"",8,"",4,"　SRTは必要ないと思う。\n今回のアンケートで初めてこの事業の事を知りました。\n\n限られた区間の移動のために都心部の車道が狭くなる事が名古屋市全体の移動効率を悪くすると思う。\nこれ以上車の動きをを制限するなんて正直信じられない。\n基幹バスのルートも恐ろしくて運転するのを躊躇する。\nまた線路ではないという事は渋滞状況にも左右されるということでしょうか？\n富山などライトレールを導入しているところも富山駅の南北がつながりようやく利用価値がでてきたと思えるがそれでも地方都市のだだっ広さから言えば距離が短い。\n富山や広島は地下鉄がないところに存在するので利用価値はあるが名古屋の場合はそもそも地下鉄があるのだからその地下鉄の料金を見直して短い区間でも気軽に乗れるようにしてほしい。\n名古屋は東京大阪に比べても地下鉄初乗りが高い、距離と金額を比べても高い。\n地下鉄はもっと気軽に乗れるものでは？大阪から名古屋に引っ越してきたが初乗り210円には驚きました。\nまずはそこを改善すべき。\n\nまた移動手段がバス、地下鉄、に加えてさらに増えると旅行者には分かりにくい。\n\n新しいことを取り入れるのも素晴らしいが今当たり前にあるサービスの見直しもお願いしたいです。"],
    [420,420,"東区",70,"男性",1,4,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",2,2,"",2,13,"",15,"",2,"　路面公共システムという専門用語、全ての世代に、もう少しわかりやすい言葉にした方がいい。名古屋は、中心部の道路がかなり広いので、この試みは十分メリットがある。他の自治体のモデルになると思う。"],
    [421,421,"中川区",20,"女性",1,4,"",1,1,"",4,"",2,"",2,6,"",2,14,"",135,"",2,"99.0"],
    [422,422,"瑞穂区",70,"女性",1,37,"",1,1,"",3,"",6,"地下鉄の方が早く目的地には着けますが、アップダウンが多いのと入り口からホームまで距離が長い、更に外の風景が見られ無いなどに不便を感じ、水平移動で乗降できるバスを利用しています。",1,245,"",2,134,"",134,"",1,"　SRTは積極的に進めて欲しいと思います。\n以前から、自動車が道路を占拠しその上健康を害する排気ガスをまき散らし空気を汚していること、その上、輸送手段として効率（車の大きさの割に人が運べない）が悪く渋滞を引き起こし益々排気ガスを放出すること等に不安を感じていました。\n多くの人を運べる路面電車があれば、どんなに良いかと常々思っていました。\n地下鉄は早いかもしれませんが、ホームへ行くまでのアップダウンと入り口からホームまでの距離が長いこと、なおかつ、暗黒な空間で、外の風景を見られ無いという意味でも快適な交通手段とは思えません。\n従って、現在私は時間がかかってもバスと名鉄電車を優先して利用している次第です。\n是非とも路面電車の敷設を希望します。\n停留所については市民の足として気軽に乗降が出来るように、出来る限り停留所の区間を短くしていただきたいと願います。\n”早く”より”快適な”乗り物を優先することが生活の豊かさに直結するのではないでしょうか。\n出来れば都心だけに限らず市内全域に路面電車が敷設されることを希望します。\nSRTの導入は多くの人が望んでいると思います。"],
    [423,423,"中区",70,"女性",1,34,"",1,5,"",3,"",1,"",5,7,"",2,6,"",8,"",4,"99.0"],
    [424,424,"南区",60,"女性",1,345,"",1,5,"",1,"",1,"",1,246,"",2,345,"",357,"",1,"　車を利用しなくて済むように郊外から直接中心部につなぐ鉄道網も必要である。"],
    [425,425,"天白区",60,"女性",1,34,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",3,2,"",2,35,"",3,"",4,"　素晴らしいものにお金をかけても1時間に数本では利用する気になれない。\n運行状況表示が必要ないくらい現在あるメーグルバスの本数を増やした方が良いと思う。"],
    [426,426,"緑区",60,"女性",1,4,"",1,3,"",3,"",4,"1日乗車券使用。",2,6,"",2,3,"",134,"",1,"　安心安全な車両。\n駐車車両が交通の妨げにならないような道路の確保。"],
    [427,427,"西区",70,"女性",1,23,"",1,5,"",2,"",5,"",1,256,"",2,134,"",345,"",1,"　758系のように待ち時間が少なく、もっと広範囲に運転して欲しい。オアシスのバスセンターになってから広小路に行くのが不便になった。地下鉄は乗り換えが不便かつ歩くのがつらい。下りのエスカレーターも増やして欲しい。"],
    [428,428,"中村区",60,"男性",1,2345,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",1,3456,"",1,6,"",9,"",4,"　SRTと名前を変えても、所詮はバス。\n環境に優しい電車ベースのLRTを導入すべきであると考える。"],
    [429,429,"東区",40,"女性",1,12,"",1,1,"",2,"",1,"",2,7,"",1,135,"",147,"",2,"99.0"],
    [430,430,"港区",50,"男性",1,57,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",2,6,"",2,234,"",167,"",2,"　SRTは良い考えだと思いますが、そこまでどう行くか、都心から離れた人にも足を運んでもらえる方法（例えば循環型鉄道とか）も合わせて考慮するとさらに発展させることができると思います。"],
    [431,431,"西区",50,"女性",1,457,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",1,146,"",2,134,"",135,"",1,"99.0"],
    [432,432,"緑区",20,"女性",1,12,"",1,1,"",4,"",2,"",2,23,"",1,2,"",46,"",2,"99.0"],
    [433,433,"守山区",20,"男性",1,45,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",3,25,"",2,15,"",146,"",3,"99.0"],
    [434,434,"天白区",20,"女性",1,4,"",1,5,"",1,"",5,"",1,236,"",2,345,"",467,"",2,"99.0"],
    [435,435,"東区",40,"男性",1,23,"",1,5,"",2,"",2,"",3,156,"",2,14,"",134,"",2,"99.0"],
    [436,436,"中村区",20,"男性",1,24,"",1,5,"",1,"",2,"",3,16,"",2,145,"",167,"",1,"99.0"],
    [437,437,"守山区",60,"男性",1,345,"",1,1,"",3,"",3,"",1,26,"",1,145,"",156,"",1,"　ヨーロッパで乗車したが、便利、快適だった。一時間に三本ぐらいではなく１０分間隔ぐらいのダイヤにしたら、新規需要を堀内起こせるでしょう。"],
    [438,438,"天白区",20,"女性",1,14,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",1,2,"",2,14,"",13,"",2,"99.0"],
    [439,439,"港区",10,"男性",1,245,"",1,1,"",1,"",2,"",3,6,"",2,35,"",35,"",1,"　都市間を気軽に移動できる手段になるので、良いと思います。"],
    [440,440,"名東区",10,"女性",1,4,"",1,1,"",4,"",6,"ドニチエコきっぷを利用する場合が多いから。",2,5,"",2,135,"",134,"",1,"99.0"],
    [441,441,"天白区",20,"女性",1,134,"",1,1,"",3,"",2,"",3,6,"",2,134,"",134,"",2,"99.0"],
    [442,442,"守山区",50,"男性",1,45,"",1,1,"",4,"",6,"暑さを防げるから",5,7,"",2,345,"",346,"",4,"　ＳＲＴに予算を使うよりも、マイナンバーカードで、コンビニで住民票を受け取れるように整備をして欲しい"],
    [443,443,"港区",50,"女性",1,34,"",1,1,"",1,"",5,"",1,356,"",1,134,"",146,"",2,"　やはり価格が重視されると思います。地下鉄の\n階段が辛い年配層には嬉しい取り組みですよね。\nこれを機会に緑もふえて綺麗な名古屋市になっていくのを期待してます。"],
    [444,444,"緑区",20,"男性",1,4,"",1,1,"",1,"",2,"",2,256,"",2,135,"",145,"",1,"　SRTが私達にとってわくわくする経験になることを願っています。"],
    [445,445,"緑区",40,"女性",1,4,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",2,26,"",2,15,"",135,"",1,"　料金と混雑具合によりますが、利用してみたいと思いました？"],
    [446,446,"名東区",20,"男性",1,47,"",1,5,"",4,"",1,"",3,8,"夏は暑くて不快",2,14,"",145,"",1,"　料金形態について、現状の市バスと同等の取り扱いにしてほしい。エコきっぷ、1日乗車券市、バス全線定期券の枠内であれば是非利用したい。\nまた運転間隔を可能な限り短くしてほしい。いつ乗り場に行ってもすぐに来ることによって速達性で地下鉄に匹敵させることができるのではないだろうか。"],
    [447,447,"守山区",50,"女性",1,5,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",1,145,"",2,13,"",346,"",2,"99.0"],
    [448,448,"中村区",70,"男性",1,4,"",1,3,"",4,"",2,"",2,2,"",2,3,"",135,"",3,"99.0"],
    [449,449,"昭和区",20,"男性",1,4,"",1,4,"",4,"",1,"",3,7,"",2,123,"",134,"",1,"　非常に魅力的な計画だと感じた。\n地下鉄よりも便利だと感じることができれば、地下鉄よりも使用頻度が多くなる可能性もあるのではないかと思う。"],
    [450,450,"中川区",60,"男性",1,24,"",1,1,"",2,"",5,"",1,28,"信号が多く、よく引っ掛かり待たされる",2,47,"地下鉄の代替という観点から言えば、ベビーカーや車いすでの乗り降りが楽にできる構造",3,"",3,"　既存の地下鉄の乗り降りや駅の利便性を向上させた方がよい。"],
    [451,451,"北区",20,"女性",1,34,"",2,99,"",4,"",2,"",2,26,"",2,13,"",57,"",2,"99.0"],
    [452,452,"名東区",20,"男性",1,47,"",1,5,"",4,"",2,"",4,256,"",2,17,"大人数が乗っても座れるような広い車両",134,"",1,"99.0"],
    [453,453,"港区",60,"女性",1,47,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",4,2,"",2,1,"",134,"",5,"99.0"],
    [454,454,"港区",30,"女性",1,34,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",3,45,"",2,6,"",13,"",3,"　地下鉄があるので、あまり路面のものに利便性を感じない。\n\n地下鉄の方が日差しや、寒い、暑いに影響されず、移動時間も読める。友人の観光案内する時の移動手段として安心出来る。\n今、スマホをもっていない人も少なく、案内人がいなくても、簡単に移動手段を調べられるので、地下鉄で移動する際に迷う事もないと思う。"],
    [455,455,"天白区",40,"男性",1,3457,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",4,24,"",2,123,"",345,"",1,"99.0"],
    [456,456,"緑区",70,"女性",1,47,"",1,5,"",1,"",5,"",5,26,"",2,1,"",345,"",5,"　余りイメージできないので、意見と言えるほどのものはありません"],
    [457,457,"緑区",30,"女性",1,57,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",2,1,"",2,134,"",134,"",1,"99.0"],
    [458,458,"港区",20,"女性",1,23457,"",1,1,"",4,"",2,"",3,5,"",2,1345,"",3457,"",1,"99.0"],
    [459,459,"北区",60,"女性",1,47,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",1,126,"",2,134,"",145,"",3,"　基幹バスの通る出来町通りは走行が難しい。車社会の名古屋市で取り組むには、一般車両への負担が大きい。名古屋城周辺には、大病院も多く、老人や病人が自家用車等で移動することは避けられない地域だと思う。一般車両とＳＲＴの共存について、しっかり検討していただきたい。"],
    [460,460,"名東区",60,"男性",1,7,"",1,1,"",6,"",5,"",2,236,"",1,134,"",456,"",2,"99.0"],
    [461,461,"名東区",40,"女性",1,47,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",4,7,"",2,145,"",346,"",3,"99.0"],
    [462,462,"天白区",70,"男性",1,34,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",1,126,"",1,134,"",345,"",1,"　全国に誇れるスマート・シティのモデルになることを期待しています。"],
    [463,463,"天白区",30,"女性",1,47,"",1,5,"",4,"",1,"",3,16,"",2,1,"",134,"",3,"99.0"],
    [464,464,"北区",60,"女性",1,34,"",1,5,"",1,"",6,"歩くことで健康増進につながるから",3,8,"普段は十分な道幅がとられていると思うが、休日など混み合っていると進みづらいことがある",2,12,"",345,"",3,"99.0"],
    [465,465,"千種区",20,"女性",1,34,"",1,5,"",1,"",5,"",2,25,"",2,145,"",135,"",2,"　私は町の情景が好きなこともあり、バスをよく利用するので、SRTには期待したいです。栄と名古屋駅を繋ぐ公共交通機関が少し不便だなと感じていました。その路線を中心に開発していただけると嬉しいです。"],
    [466,466,"中村区",50,"男性",1,34,"",1,5,"",1,"",1,"",3,4,"",2,13,"",347,"",4,"　今からお金をかけて、新しい物を作るのには反対します。今現在ある、バス、タクシーなどを上手く活用してみては。"],
    [467,467,"天白区",50,"女性",1,4,"",1,1,"",4,"",2,"",1,2,"",2,13,"",457,"",5,"　地下鉄のように階段の上り下りがないのが魅力的。実現したらぜひ利用したい。"],
    [468,468,"天白区",20,"男性",1,34,"",1,1,"",3,"",3,"",2,258,"歩行者信号の信号待ちが長い（タイミングが悪い）",1,124,"",135,"",1,"99.0"],
    [469,469,"千種区",50,"男性",1,47,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",3,2,"",2,14,"",3,"",3,"99.0"],
    [470,470,"昭和区",30,"女性",1,347,"",1,5,"",1,"",2,"",5,2,"",2,1,"",157,"",2,"99.0"],
    [471,471,"北区",60,"女性",1,14,"",1,4,"",4,"",1,"",5,26,"",2,13,"",134,"",2,"99.0"],
    [472,472,"東区",40,"男性",1,34,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",4,68,"自転車道路の拡充をして頂きたいです。歩行者と自転車の双方が安心して通行出来るように、車道に自転車専用区域を広げてもらいたいです。",2,234,"",379,"街の回遊には、自転車持ち込み可能になれば、とても魅力的だと思います。",1,"　SRTには車の台数の削減ありきではなく、歩行者、交通機関、自転車、車、全てが共存出来ることに意味があると思います。\n\n海外のような、自転車持ち込み電車や自転車持ち込みバスは観光やエコの観点からもとても先進的な街のイメージかあります。"],
    [473,473,"守山区",40,"女性",1,45,"",1,4,"",4,"",1,"",1,7,"",2,13,"",16,"",4,"　待合室があるのは悪くないけど、そもそも待って乗り物は乗りたくない。"],
    [474,474,"中村区",70,"女性",1,34,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",5,2,"",2,14,"",145,"",3,"　SRTが実現できれば素晴らしいと思いますが自家用車との競合はどうかな"],
    [475,475,"名東区",40,"男性",1,47,"",1,1,"",6,"",5,"",4,126,"",2,135,"",13457,"",1,"99.0"],
    [476,476,"千種区",20,"女性",1,34,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",1,25,"",2,12,"",123,"",2,"99.0"],
    [477,477,"西区",40,"女性",1,47,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",5,346,"",2,7,"自転車と一緒に乗れる車両",135,"",3,"　バスレーンのある名古屋の出来町を運転するときはいつも怖さがある。\n右折レーンとバスレーンと直進など慣れてない人は分かりずらいし事故も起こりやすい為、それと同じような感じにはならないようにしてほしい。\n長崎の路面電車の道はもっと怖かったです。\n車と交わる所があまりないようにしてほしい。\n\n自転車を乗せられるようにしてほしい。\nそうすれば車で移動するより便利。"],
    [478,478,"港区",50,"女性",1,34,"",1,1,"",3,"",1,"",2,6,"",2,134,"",1345,"",1,"　実現したら嬉しいです。\n栄と名古屋間をスムーズに行きで来ると良い。\n歩けるほど近くはないし、地下鉄に乗るには、階段を降りたり人混みを歩かねばならず、エスカレータの場所も分かりづらく、高齢者にも利用しにくい。\n７５８バスは、道路が渋滞しているので時間が読めない。"],
    [479,479,"西区",50,"男性",1,12,"",1,1,"",1,"",6,"運動のため",1,26,"",2,13,"",135,"",1,"99.0"],
    [480,480,"緑区",20,"男性",1,4,"",1,5,"",1,"",2,"",3,126,"",1,6,"",123457,"",3,"99.0"],
    [481,481,"熱田区",40,"男性",1,45,"",1,1,"",4,"",1,"",3,7,"",2,134,"",134,"",4,"　なし"]
]}